[IP] more on So now the FTC is in on the act
Begin forwarded message:
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: May 29, 2005 9:25:34 PM EDT
To: Phil Karn <karn@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IP] So now the FTC is in on the act
Would these recommendations be more to your taste, Phil? :)
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/5/47/34935342.pdf
This is a paper that I wrote a few months back, on spam issues in
developing countries. Funnily enough, 99% of these are the same
issues that people / ISPs etc face anywhere in the world, whether in
the USA or in Nepal and Nigeria.
suresh
Phil Karn wrote:
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
The FTC recommendations are remarkably like the ones that several
ISP postmasters, working together, have adopted as a best current
practice for ISPs, at MAAWG (http://www.maawg.org)
Obviously the wrong people are working on those BCPs. I guess it's
time to get involved and show them both why port blocking is so
objectionable *and* that there are even better ways to accomplish
what they want without causing so much collateral damage.
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/