[IP] To eliminate spam, arrest 200 people: a proposal [sp]
Begin forwarded message:
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@xxxxxxxx>
Date: May 19, 2005 11:13:31 PM EDT
To: politech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Politech] To eliminate spam, arrest 200 people: a proposal
[sp]
[In general I like Brad's ideas on spam, but I'm not so sure about
this one. It's difficult to draft "only 200" legislation. Statutory
language for critique, anyone? Remember that if it's state law, it
must comply with Can Spam's partial preemption. --Declan]
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Politech] Canada's solution to stopping spam: "new,
targeted legislation" [sp]
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 00:58:39 -0700
From: Brad Templeton <btm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: http://www.templetons.com/brad
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@xxxxxxxx>
CC: politech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <428C0EB7.2010203@xxxxxxxx>
Declan, tonight I dined with a major spam fighter and he said he
had direct confirmation of the fact that the vast bulk of spam
is sent by a small number of parties, perhaps 200 at most, and
the bulk of that by a core group of about 20.
If this is true, I think a solution is suggested. Up to now, there
have been bitter fights over spam laws. Anti-spammers seek laws
that will cover every time of spam they can think of. Civil liberties
advocates get scared of any law that efficient and the unintended
free speech consequences. The DMA and other lobbies have their own
agenda. So we fight, and argue. Every law has people swearing it is
too weak and others that it is too strong.
So let's put the idea of 200 core spammers to the test. People should
draft a law that only hits those 200 spammers. A law very tightly
targetted on activity that everybody agrees is illegal. Yes, a law that
misses a lot of possible spam which some will decry is "legitimizing"
that spam. But one that will get those core spammers, get them easily,
and get them hard. It will fund and demand enforcement. (These
spammers
are already breaking existing laws but nothing funds the enforcement of
them.)
If the thesis that they are doing most of the spam is true, we'll fix
a lot of the spam problem (and scare away those who might consider
entering the upper echelons of spamming.) If it's not enough the
debate can resume over the best spam techniques.
_______________________________________________
Politech mailing list
Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/