[IP] Replies to new House bill revamping U.S. drivers licenses [priv]
------ Forwarded Message
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 23:38:23 -0500
To: <politech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Politech] Replies to new House bill revamping U.S. drivers
licenses [priv]
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Politech] Highlights from new bill revamping state
drivers licenses [priv]
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:21:20 -0500
From: Michael G. Thompson <ferret@xxxxxxx>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@xxxxxxxx>
References: <20050126164750.A11338@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Declan McCullagh wrote:
>I managed to get a copy of the bill and have placed it here:
>http://www.politechbot.com/docs/drivers.license.bill.012605.pdf
>
>A few highlights:
>
>
Lowlights you mean! About 10 years ago, I worked for the IT branch of
the Maryland MVA. At one point, they had the fine old idea of selling
the entire picture database to a private firm in Massachusetts, which
would have essentially done the same thing for the private sector. If
I'm not going to allow that to go unprotested, you can betcher ass that
giving DHS unfettered access to my diriving record and photo is going to
go over like a neutronium balloon. And to those of you who say that DHS
is only trying to protect the nation from terrorists, I say to you: How
safe do you feel now? There is no proof that this would be a safer
thing to do, and there is plenty of proof that it would put a lot of
power in the hands of federal employees who have almost no motivation to
properly secure and control access.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Politech] New House bill mandates national standard for
state drivers licenses [priv]
Date: 26 Jan 2005 21:22:14 -0500
From: John R Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxx>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@xxxxxxxx>
References: <20050126161914.A10968@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> [Note "tough physical security requirements to reduce
> counterfeiting..." More biometrics, perhaps? I haven't seen the text
> yet, though. --Declan]
I don't see how biometrics would help. The issue is fake licenses.
Someone making a fake license shouldn't have any trouble putting your
correct height, nose hair color, etc. on it. I'd expect those
requirements to be more like the ones for money, microprinting, color
changing holograms, stuff like that.
R's,
John
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Politech] New House bill mandates national standard for
statedrivers licenses [priv]
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:09:55 -0500
From: Katherine BAUFAY <spacelink@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@xxxxxxxx>
Here you have it...
The de facto ID card for all Americans.
Oh boy where will the hyperbole end if it ends one day, we all know that
the 9-11 terrorists we acting on their own identity so genuine or fake
ID is not the point when fighting against terrorism.
I'm just curious to see how Americans will react when their government
will "ask" for their fingerprints, just like they are doing to foreigners...
Kate
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Politech] Highlights from new bill revamping state
drivers licenses [priv]
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:17:17 -0400
From: Carl S. Hartzman <carloscc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@xxxxxxxx>
Hello Declan McCullagh,
I read the bill. I am an ordinary literate person not conversant with the
nuances of the law. Many of the provisions seem to DENY RECOURSE TO THE
COURTS for refugee claimants with regard to the decisions of the triers of
their cases. It also seems empower the Secretary of Homeland Defense to
disregard law in the conduct of certain of his activities and DENY RECOURSE
TO THE COURTS to any of us when he does so.
To me, this is indicative of a growing attitude in the U.S. that government
should be "above the law", that it alright to deny due process, that
constitutional "rights" should be subordinate today to the fight against
terrorism and tomorrow to who knows what.
I find this at least as disturbing as the prospect of a national ID and its
accompanying database. I find the two things together intolerable, an
internal threat to the nation as great as any external threat.
CSH
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Politech] Highlights from new bill revamping state
drivers licenses [priv]
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:06:30 +1300
From: Steve Withers <swithers@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@xxxxxxxx>
References: <20050126164750.A11338@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 11:47, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> * This bill requires "a common machine-readable technology, with
> defined minimum data elements" and the presentation of a Social
> Security Number before a license can be issued.
What a shame they do not display the same determination in favor of
consistency where the conduct of elections is concerned.
With the Bush administration, improving the 'security state' comes
first......voting and democracy are of lesser importance.
Their own actions prove this to be the case.
_______________________________________________
Politech mailing list
Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
------ End of Forwarded Message
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/