<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[IP] more on AT&T Wireless vs. Cingular text message charges



------ Forwarded Message
From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 13:20:43 -0800
To: <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <lauren@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: AT&T Wireless vs. Cingular text message charges

Dave,

Given what it costs the carriers to send and receive domestic SMS
text messages (practically nothing), text messages are one of the
biggest ripoffs in telecommications.  It's worth noting that former
AT&T Wireless customers are (under all plans that I'm aware of
anyway) *not* charged for receiving text messages, only for sending
(so long as they are still on their AT&T calling plans).

I just spoke to a Cingular rep (after going through the usual
ballyhoo to reach a human) who confirmed that so long as former AT&T
Wireless customers stay on their current AT&T Wireless plans, they
still are not charged for incoming text messages by Cingular.
However, if they switch to a Cingular plan, the Cingular incoming
text message charges would apply.

So many former AT&T Wireless subs may wish to sit tight for now.

--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein
lauren@xxxxxxxx or lauren@xxxxxxxxxx or lauren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800
http://www.pfir.org/lauren
Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org
Co-Founder, Fact Squad - http://www.factsquad.org
Co-Founder, URIICA - Union for Representative International Internet
                     Cooperation and Analysis - http://www.uriica.org
Moderator, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com
Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com

 - - -

> I completely agree. With SMS spam starting the notion of receiver being
> charged is even MORE insane. I intend to protest each and ever spam sms I
> receive as a illegitimate change
> 
> We can sink them in overhead
> 
> Dave
> 
> ------ Forwarded Message
> From: adam beecher <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Organization: BEECHER.NET
> Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 16:40:22 +0000
> To: <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [IP] Young Cell Users Rack Up Debt, One Dime Message at a Time
> 
> I still find it absolutely bizarre that American service providers charge
> for /receipt/ of a text message, and even more bizarre that ye let them get
> away with it. The entire concept is preposterous. The PHB that came up with
> the idea is an evil genius that should be jailed for your protection.
> 
> adam
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------
> You are subscribed as lauren@xxxxxxxx
> To manage your subscription, go to
>   http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
> 
> Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/

------ End of Forwarded Message


-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
  http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/