[IP] On junk science
Begin forwarded message:
From:
Date: December 7, 2004 7:05:50 PM EST
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
W Junk science is itself a rats nest of conflicts of interest and nutty
axi-grinding. Its "editor" is tied to the Cato Institute and is a
regular on low-brow stuff like the Gordon Liddy Show and Fox. It is
cranky street-theater, and not worthy of serious people who can
actually think for themselves.
best
-
On Dec 7, 2004, at 2:28 PM, David Farber wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jim Warren <jwarren@xxxxxxxx>
Date: December 7, 2004 5:19:23 PM EST
To: Dave Farber:;
Subject: fwd: Junk Science Awards...
http://www.junkscience.com/dec04/junkscienceawards2004.htm
WASHINGTON, D.C., (Dec. 1) -- JunkScience.com today announced its list
of the Top Ten Most Embarrassing Moments in Health and Environmental
Science for 2004. The list spotlights individuals and organizations
that -- through exaggerated claims, bad judgment, and/or hidden
agendas -- have most egregiously undermined public confidence in the
scientific community's capacity to conduct sound and unbiased
research.
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as psaffo@xxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/