<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[IP] [Technical] Land Grab - What If Wal-Mart Got in the WiMax Business?





Begin forwarded message:

From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: November 28, 2004 12:20:49 PM EST
To: Dewayne-Net Technology List <dewayne-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Dewayne-Net] Land Grab - What If Wal-Mart Got in the WiMax Business?
Reply-To: dewayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

November 25, 2004

Land Grab

What If Wal-Mart Got in the WiMax Business?

By Robert X. Cringely
<http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20041125.html>

The world has gone crazy for wireless data. In the dismal days since the dot-com meltdown of 2001, almost the only happy business news has been in the wireless sector, whether it is WiFi, Bluetooth, SMS messaging, you name it. WiFi hotspots are everywhere, 3G mobile data is slowly coming, and next year, we'll see the first 802.16 WiMax products -- the first of these initiatives to cause real concern for the telephone companies. WiMax, which promises fixed wireless 70 megabit-per-second data service over a distance up to 50 kilometers, scares the phone companies because it will be for the most part a licensed carrier-class service that is capable of completely replacing the current local telephone network. If you are a bloated and conniving phone company, WiMax is bad news.

So of course, they'll try to kill it.

Many people think current WiFi technology also threatens the telcos, but it doesn't. For one thing, WiFi networks are just too darned small, and if WiFi hotspot aggregation was going to be a successful business, wouldn't we see one or more of the aggregators making money by now? Yes, you could link together 100,000 or more hotspots and create the equivalent of a wireless Baby Bell, but there simply isn't that kind of money being put into commercial hotspots. Even the boldest aggregation plan called for only 20,000 hotspots, and that outfit is already out of business. It ain't gonna happen. And the reason it won't is also because of WiFi's great strength -- the use of unlicensed radio spectrum.

It is hard to build a business model around unlicensed radio frequencies and here's why: Anyone can use them for any acceptable purpose, no matter how stupid. If WiFi came to be a real threat to the phone companies, they'd just start their own WiFi businesses to undermine any possible hotspot success. This wouldn't be the enlightened phone company cannibalizing its own network before someone else does -- it would be the very unenlightened telephone company trying to screw-up the WiFi space for everyone else.

All a Verizon, a BellSouth, or an SBC would have to do is throw their own WiFi access points up on telephone poles all over town, but instead of using them for Internet access, they'd use them to continuously broadcast bad movies on every available channel. As long as a real service was being offered, even if it is a service being used by only phone company employees (training videos, 24/7) then the FCC could not classify this use spectrum as causing "egregious interference." No foul, but also no reliable WiFi service, either, just all "Plan 9 From Outer Space" all the time. And that's why the phone company doesn't worry about WiFi.

[snip]


Archives at: <http://Wireless.Com/Dewayne-Net>
Weblog at: <http://weblog.warpspeed.com>

-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/