[IP] more on Editor's position on IP coverage on the Day After
Begin forwarded message:
From: Simon Higgs <simon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: November 5, 2004 3:42:43 AM EST
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IP] Editor's position on IP coverage on the Day After
But Dave,
This is my first Presidential election since becoming a citizen. All I
see is conjecture and opinion based around unreconcilable "facts" by
intellectuals with a grudge.
I still can't get my head around this all consuming hatred for the
"other" party. It just has to go. This type of discourse (which is
worse than the average jr high nonsense) just isn't interesting
anymore.
Simon
I have been filtering the email from both sides to pick ones that add
value to seeing how badly this nation is divided over the election.
The only way to even attempt to heal the wounds are to understand why
they exist.
Saying "all is now well" will not work. We have to understand each
others positions and concerns.
Again, the purpose of IP is to make inform the readers and the editor
and to make them think about the issues -- both technical and policy.
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as simon@xxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/