[IP] FCC chiefs to work through outdated rules
Begin forwarded message:
From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: October 14, 2004 4:15:13 PM GMT+01:00
To: Dewayne-Net Technology List <dewayne-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Dewayne-Net] FCC chiefs to work through outdated rules
Reply-To: dewayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
FCC chiefs to work through outdated rules
Telecommunications Act leaves FCC with few tools to deal with new
issues, commissioners say
By Stephen Lawson, IDG News Service
October 13, 2004
<http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/10/13/HNtelecomfcc_1.html?
source=rss&url=http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/10/13/
HNtelecomfcc_1.html>
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
LAS VEGAS - Three U.S. Federal Communications Commissioners on
Wednesday said laws governing telecommunications need to be revamped,
but said the agency will do all it can under the current rules to
encourage deployment of new technologies and services.
The Commission is faced with trying to regulate technologies that are
not addressed in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which gives it few
tools to deal with new issues as they come up, said Commissioner
Kathleen Abernathy, during a group appearance at the Telecom '04 show
in Las Vegas. She would like to see Congress rework the law, especially
to provide a better definition of "advanced services," essentially
broadband services that accommodate voice, video and data.
Another issue that needs more clarity is jurisdiction, as wireless
communication is controlled by the federal government, cable mostly at
the local level and telecommunications at both levels, she added. The
overlapping layers of jurisdiction cause uncertainty for service
providers and raise their costs with the need for more lawyers, she
said. Abernathy expects the FCC to examine jurisdiction issues over the
next few months.
Michael Gallagher, assistant secretary of commerce for communications
and information and head of the National Telecommunications and
Information Administration, cautioned against letting the industry get
tied up waiting for major new legislation, pointing out that 1996 Act
took 12 years to complete. The danger is that telecommunications will
end up like the electric power industry, with companies scared off by
regulatory uncertainty from making investments, he said.
Commissioner Kevin Martin said he is most proud of the Commission's
work in defining how new fiber networks should be treated in terms of
network sharing. The FCC last year issued its Triennial Review Order,
which generally left the new infrastructure alone in terms of
requirements to "unbundle" network elements for use by competitors at
regulated rates.
The details of that order have yet to be firmed up, according to some
carriers, but the Commission is set on Thursday to consider requests by
BellSouth Corp. and SureWest Communications Inc. for clarification on
unbundling of FTTC (fiber to the curb) networks. An executive of SBC
Communications Inc., another FTTC proponent, said Tuesday he expects
that decision to be favorable to his company's plans. A Verizon
Communications Inc. executive also said Tuesday he believes the FCC is
prepared to clarify the rules in favor of that carrier's FTTH (fiber to
the home) plans.
The commissioners and Gallagher all said they want to see the industry
form a consensus and come to the government with a unified position
that can be used in reaching compromises on regulation. Other
industries, such as aerospace and biotechnology, already have done
this, Gallagher said.
"They come together and the government responds, and there's a clear
agenda that's put before them," Gallagher said. "In telecom, there's an
urgent need for it."
Carriers have already made strides in this direction, such as the
Intercarrier Compensation Forum (ICF), said Commissioner Jonathan
Adelstein. The ICF has proposed changes to the system of payments
between carriers to complete calls. It's critical to resolve issues so
investment can go ahead, Adelstein said.
"We can't afford to continue to have this kind of uncertainty," he
said.
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/