[IP] war resolution justified on grounds bush was told were false
___
Dave Farber +1 412 726 9889
...... Forwarded Message .......
From: Gordon Cook <cook@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx, dewayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jock@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 15:54:15 -0400
Subj: war resolution justified on grounds bush was told were false
For IP or dewayne net
An extraordinary 10,300 word article from tomorrow's New York Times
Skewed Intelligence Data in March to War in Iraq
By DAVID BARSTOW, WILLIAM J. BROAD
and JEFF GERTH
This article was reported by David Barstow, William J. Broad and
Jeff Gerth, and was written by Mr.
Barstow.
In 2002, at a crucial juncture on the path to war, senior members of
the Bush administration gave a
series of speeches and interviews in which they asserted that Saddam
Hussein was rebuilding his
nuclear weapons program. In a speech to veterans that August, Vice
President Dick Cheney said Mr.
Hussein could have an atomic bomb "fairly soon." President Bush,
addressing the United Nations the
next month, said there was "little doubt" about Mr. Hussein's
appetite for nuclear arms.
The United States intelligence community had not yet concluded that
Iraq was rebuilding its nuclear
weapons program. But as the vice president told a group of Wyoming
Republicans that September, the
United States had "irrefutable evidence" - thousands of tubes made of
high-strength aluminum, tubes
that the Bush administration said were destined for clandestine Iraqi
uranium centrifuges, before some
were seized at the behest of the United States.
The tubes quickly became a critical exhibit in the administration's
brief against Iraq. As the only
physical evidence the United States of Mr. Hussein's revived nuclear
ambitions, they gave credibility to
the apocalyptic imagery invoked by President Bush and his advisers.
The tubes were "only really suited
for nuclear weapons programs," Condoleezza Rice, the president's
national security adviser, asserted
on CNN on Sept. 8, 2002. "We don't want the smoking gun to be a
mushroom cloud."
But before Ms. Rice made those remarks, she was aware that the
government's foremost nuclear
experts had concluded that the tubes were most likely not for nuclear
weapons at all, an examination
by The New York Times has found. As early as 2001, her staff had been
told that these experts, at the
Energy Department, believed the tubes were probably intended for
small artillery rockets, according to
four officials at the Central Intelligence Agency and a senior
administration official, all of whom spoke
on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the
information.
http://nytimes.com/2004/10/03/international/middleeast/03tube.html?
hp=&pagewanted=print&position=
--------
--
=============================================================
The COOK Report on Internet Protocol, 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA
609 882-2572 (PSTN) 415 651-4147 (Lingo) cook@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subscription
info: http://cookreport.com/subscriptions.shtml Worldcall to use ISDN
interconnec-
tion to offer equivalent of ILEC UNE platform at:
http://cookreport.com/13.09.shtml
=============================================================
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/