[IP] Election Pledge: Broadband Access for All
Begin forwarded message:
From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: September 14, 2004 10:39:54 PM EDT
To: Dewayne-Net Technology List <dewayne-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Dewayne-Net] Election Pledge: Broadband Access for All
Reply-To: dewayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Election Pledge: Broadband Access for All
Both Presidential Candidates Tout the Internet Technology But Avoid
Subsidy Question
By ANNE MARIE SQUEO
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
September 14, 2004; Page A4
At the onset of the Great Depression, supporters of President Herbert
Hoover's presidential campaign promised "a chicken in every pot and a
car in every garage."
This year's election pledge: high-speed Internet connections for all.
For months, President Bush and his Democratic challenger, Sen. John
Kerry, have been one-upping each other about the necessity for
ubiquitous broadband and how to achieve it. But for all the rhetoric,
the two candidates aren't far apart and both duck a central issue:
Should a nationwide broadband rollout be subsidized by the government?
Industry executives, who by early August had contributed nearly $11
million to the presidential candidates, are pushing for a national
broadband policy to speed adoption of the technology. Countries with
such policies, including South Korea and Canada, have used government
funds to boost subscription rates, and the technology industry wants
the U.S. to do the same.
"We've been trying to get the administration to have some of the
federal monies used to subsidize the spread of broadband," says Matthew
Flanigan, president of the Telecommunications Industry Association, a
trade group representing more than 1,000 telecommunications and
high-technology companies.
Both industries were hit particularly hard when the stock market and
economy tumbled in 2001. "The information-technology sector is critical
to the future growth of this country," Mr. Flanigan says. "We created
the most jobs in this decade and lost the most in the last three or
four years."
Such complaints certainly have the candidates' attention. President
Bush kicked off the rhetoric in March, proclaiming to a New Mexico
audience: "This country needs a national goal for...universal,
affordable access for broadband technology by 2007." He has repeated
this several times in speeches in Minneapolis, Washington and
elsewhere, with various embellishments, including the need to "clear
regulatory hurdles" and keep the Internet free from taxes.
Sen. Kerry, meanwhile, called for spending $2 billion over five years
in tax credits for companies that invest in building the fiber-optic
and other networks necessary for widespread broadband deployment,
especially in rural and underserved areas. In a June speech to a
high-tech audience in San Jose, Calif., he lambasted the Bush
administration for making budget cuts and policy decisions that
"eroded" the U.S. position as a technology leader.
Whether broadband access would be widened through federal subsidies
under either candidate remains in question. Industry officials argue it
is necessary to bring down the cost of broadband subscriptions,
currently still at least $30 a month in much of the country.
Sen. Kerry's tax credit could be interpreted as a form of government
funding. President Bush, through an Agriculture Department program, has
invested $21.3 million in grants to wire schools, hospitals and
emergency workers in small towns. But neither has gone further down the
subsidy path.
The pressure to wire more of America will keep the question alive. A
recent study by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development, an international think tank in Paris, ranked the U.S. 10th
in world-wide broadband deployment in 2003, behind South Korea, which
ranked first, Canada and Iceland. In 2001, the U.S. ranked fourth.
The administration defends its record overall, noting the president and
the Federal Communications Commission have worked to ease regulations
on broadband providers. Mr. Bush signed an executive order making it
easier to run fiber-optic cables over federal land, and the FCC has
been trying to roll back regulations for high-speed Internet access to
spur investment. "This administration understands the potential," said
John Marburger III, science adviser to Mr. Bush, over the summer.
Industry and government officials say at least 75% of the country now
has access to at least one broadband provider, even in rural areas. The
latest FCC data found U.S. homes and businesses had 28.2 million
high-speed Internet lines by the end of 2003, up 42% from 2002.
The majority of Americans still connect to the Internet from home
through dial-up phone service, which typically operates at 56,000 bits
a second and works for tasks such as sending e-mail, paying bills and
shopping. Broadband, whether provided by a phone, cable or wireless
operator, functions at least four times as fast and at potentially
quite higher speeds.
That would permit more-complex tasks to be done online, including
watching movies, making Internet phone calls, and taking real-time
classes at far-off universities. High-speed connections would foster
more of that, while creating the incentive to build or upgrade
fiber-optic networks for higher speeds. (Broadband service in South
Korea, for example, now reaches three million bits a second.)
Widespread availability of high-speed Internet connections could add
$500 billion to the U.S. economy and generate more than 1.2 million
jobs, says Robert Crandall, an economist at the Brookings Institution
who was a co-author of a report on the topic last year for telephone
company Verizon Communications Inc.
The Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan research group, said
that as of Aug. 2, the communications and equipment sector, which
includes both regional phone companies and entertainment businesses,
had donated $62.6 million in the 2004 election cycle. Sen. Kerry took
in about $6.06 million, compared with $4.6 million for the president.
Yet, the four regional phone companies -- Verizon, SBC Communications
Inc., BellSouth Corp. and Qwest Communications International Inc. --
gave the majority of their total $5.1 million in contributions to
Republicans, according to the center.
Write to Anne Marie Squeo at annemarie.squeo@xxxxxxx
URL for this article:
<http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB109511228446416664,00.html>
Archives at: <http://Wireless.Com/Dewayne-Net>
Weblog at: <http://weblog.warpspeed.com>
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/