<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[IP] more on A New Selective Service Draft





Begin forwarded message:

From: Richard Fritzson <fritzson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: September 13, 2004 8:28:26 AM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IP] A New Selective Service Draft

Dave,
Gordon Jacobson presents a "far more balanced view of his remarks" by describing the problem of poverty in the US as "Rangel's ghetto". I'm sure that Fox News would agree that this is "fair and balanced".

If he really wanted to balance this letter about the draft he could have pointed everyone to Snopes which last wrote about this letter in May of this year ( http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/draft.asp ).

There each of the items are examined and alternative, relatively harmless, explanations given for these facts. (The facts aren't questioned at all.) However, it isn't Snopes's most definitive answer, it ends with:

There is as yet no definitive answer to the question of whether
or not the U.S. will reinstitute a draft. Obviously some thought
has been given to the issue, but the possibility that such thoughts
will be turned into reality appears rather small at this point. Still,
conditions and attitudes can change very quickly — another event
of the magnitude of the September 11 attacks could prompt
some rapid shifts in government policy and public opinion.

I think that, regardless of the results of November's election, another serious terrorist attack is still somewhat likely. Having the Selective Service boards filled and bills ready to go in both houses of Congress means that not only can "conditions and attitudes" change very quickly but reality can as well.

The Patriot Act wasn't written after the 9/11 attack. It was written before it and was waiting for an opportunity to get through Congress. Right after 9/11, a bill which had previously been unthinkable had an opening and became law without enough public discussion at a time when emotions were running too high.

It seems to me that the draft is progressing to that level of readiness. And this is the time to talk about it. After the next act of terrorism, the bills can become laws and the Selective Service will be fully staffed and ready. People who try to discuss it then will be shouted down. That people get shouted down now, when there is time to discuss it, is an indication of how seriously broken things are in this country.

Rich Fritzson



-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/