<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[IP] Where There's Traffic There's a Traffic Jam



From Capitol Hill Blue


Ain't This America. . .
Where There's Traffic There's a Traffic Jam
By DALE McFEATTERS
Sep 9, 2004, 05:35



Something deep in the American soul suggests that if a place is easy to get to, it's probably not worth going. Hence we come to the celebration of the Great American Traffic Jam.

We even have an organization that studies traffic and offers an annual evaluation, the Texas Transportation Institute _ an affiliate of Texas A&M University located, perhaps by design, in College Station, a town noted for the absence of traffic and much else.

Its annual list of cities with the worst traffic has just come out, and you can bet it was awaited eagerly by city officials everywhere.

Not surprisingly, the Los Angeles area topped the list, with the average commuter spending 93 hours a year in traffic. That's almost four whole days. You can bet Los Angeles is secretly pleased at being No. 1. To be big-league, you've got to have big traffic.

L.A. is comfortably ahead of No. 2, the San Francisco Bay Area, with an average of 73 hours a year spent stuck in traffic, but L.A. authorities undoubtedly keep a close eye on their in-state rival. If San Francisco starts creeping up the charts, look for Los Angeles to send out the guys with the orange cones to start closing down freeway lanes until the city regains it edge.

Civic pride shines through the report. The Texas authors note that Dallas made the biggest jump in jammed traffic, going from 13 hours annually in 1982 to 61 hours annually in 2002 and fourth on the list. The folks in Dallas aren't going to let Houston forget that its commuters waste only 58 hours a year, sixth on the list after No. 5 _ oh, the shame of it all _ Atlanta.

Third on the list is Washington, D.C., with 67 hours. Traffic lovers should be proud of the national capital because it starts with a handicap. There is long-standing disposition against high-rise buildings _ the city itself has a flat ban on them _ and so there isn't the density you would think you'd need for really bad traffic.

But Washington has that gung-ho government spirit going for it, where traffic-saving projects are infinitely planned and eternally postponed and lying about the speed of one's commute is a local folk art, like whistling or whittling.

Washington has something else going for it _ police roadblocks, Jersey barriers, blocked-off streets and traffic-stopping motorcades for even minor dignitaries. All of this is passed off as "security," but the more likely explanation is that local resident George W. Bush hates California so much he wants to see Los Angeles knocked off its perch.

The average for being stuck in urban traffic was 46 hours a year; so if you live in a big city and your average annual commute is faster than that, somebody in authority isn't trying.

The big cities with the fastest commutes tend to be those in the Rust Belt that have experienced major job losses _ Pittsburgh, Cleveland and Buffalo, N.Y. There's nothing like unemployment to cut commuting time. In that sense, traffic jams are a sign of economic vitality, another reason for civic pride in jammed roads.

Buffalo, which lays claim to big-league status, is last on the list of big cities, with only 10 hours of traffic congestion each year. Note to Buffalo's city managers: You're on the fast lane to gooberdom. If you're not wasting time, time is a-wasting; just 11 places on the list separate you from such bucolic outposts as Brownsville, Texas, and Anchorage, Alaska.

See you in traffic.




(Contact Dale McFeatters at McFeattersD@xxxxxxxx)


© Copyright 2004 Capitol Hill Blue

Fair Use Notice
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

<http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/printer_5212.shtml>

-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/