[IP] Big Business Becoming Big Brother
Begin forwarded message:
From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: August 9, 2004 12:34:56 PM EDT
To: Dewayne-Net Technology List <dewayne-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Dewayne-Net] Big Business Becoming Big Brother
Reply-To: dewayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[Note: This item comes from reader Randy Burge. DLH]
From: Randy Burge <burge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: August 9, 2004 8:18:51 AM PDT
To: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Big Business Becoming Big Brother
<http://www.wired.com/news/conflict/0,2100,64492,00.html>
Big Business Becoming Big Brother
By Kim Zetter | Page 1 of 2
02:00 AM Aug. 09, 2004 PT
The government is increasingly using corporations to do its surveillance
work, allowing it to get around restrictions that protect the privacy
and
civil liberties of Americans, according to a report released Monday by
the
American Civil Liberties Union, an organization that works to protect
civil
liberties.
Data aggregators -- companies that aggregate information from numerous
private and public databases -- and private companies that collect
information about their customers are increasingly giving or selling
data to
the government to augment its surveillance capabilities and help it
track
the activities of people.
Because laws that restrict government data collection don't apply to
private
industry, the government is able to bypass restrictions on domestic
surveillance. Congress needs to close such loopholes, the ACLU said,
before
the exchange of information gets out of hand.
"Americans would really be shocked to discover the extent of the
practices
that are now common in both industry and government," said the ACLU's
Jay
Stanley, author of the report. "Industry and government know that, so
they
have a strong incentive to not publicize a lot of what's going on."
Last year, JetBlue Airways acknowledged that it secretly gave defense
contractor Torch Concepts 5 million passenger itineraries for a
government
project on passenger profiling without the consent of the passengers.
The
contractor augmented the data with passengers' Social Security numbers,
income information and other personal data to test the feasibility of a
screening system called CAPPS II. That project was slated to launch
later
this year until the government scrapped it. Other airlines also
contributed
data to the project.
Information about the data-sharing project came to light only by
accident.
Critics like Stanley say there are many other government projects like
this
that are proceeding in secret.
The ACLU released the Surveillance-Industrial Complex report in
conjunction
with a new website designed to educate the public about how information
collected from them is being used.
The report listed three ways in which government agencies obtain data
from
the private sector: by purchasing the data, by obtaining a court order
or
simply by asking for it. Corporations freely share information with
government agencies because they don't want to appear to be unpatriotic,
they hope to obtain future lucrative Homeland Security contracts with
the
government or they fear increased government scrutiny of their business
practices if they don't share.
But corporations aren't the only ones giving private data to the
government..
In 2002, the Professional Association of Diving Instructors voluntarily
gave
the FBI the names and addresses of some 2 million people who had studied
scuba diving in previous years. And a 2002 survey found that nearly 200
colleges and universities gave the FBI information about students. Most
of
these institutions provided the information voluntarily without having
received a subpoena.
Collaborative surveillance between government and the private sector is
not
new. For three decades during the Cold War, for example, telegraph
companies
like Western Union, RCA Global and International Telephone and Telegraph
gave the National Security Agency, or NSA, all cables that went to or
from
the United States. Operation Shamrock, which ran from 1945 to 1975,
helped
the NSA compile 75,000 files on individuals and organizations, many of
them
involved in peace movements and civil disobedience.
These days, the increasing amount of electronic data that is collected
and
stored, along with developments in software technology, make it easy
for the
government to sort through mounds of data quickly to profile individuals
through their connections and activities.
Although the Privacy Act of 1974 prohibits the government from keeping
dossiers on Americans unless they are the specific target of an
investigation, the government circumvents the legislation by
piggybacking on
private-sector data collection.
Corporations are not subject to congressional oversight or Freedom of
Information Act requests -- two methods for monitoring government
activities
and exposing abuses. And no laws prevent companies from voluntarily
sharing
most data with the government.
"The government is increasingly ... turning to private companies, which
are
not subject to the law, and buying or compelling the transfer of private
data that it could not collect itself," the report states.
<snip>
Archives at: <http://Wireless.Com/Dewayne-Net>
Weblog at: <http://weblog.warpspeed.com>
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/