[IP] How They Could Steal the Election This Time and response
From: "R. A. Hettinga" <rah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: July 31, 2004 4:03:41 PM EDT
To: cryptography@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: How They Could Steal the Election This Time
<http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20040816&s=dugger>
Click here to return to the browser-optimized version of this page.
This article can be found on the web at
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040816&s=dugger
How They Could Steal the Election This Time
by RONNIE DUGGER
[from the August 16, 2004 issue]
AND from Mike Shamos who was quoted in the article
"I sent the following to The Nation today:"
To the Editor:
Ronnie Dugger's article ("How They Could Steal The Election This Time,"
Aug. 16) contains an error in its very first sentence and things only
go downhill from there. He claims that voting system vendors could
program the machines "to invisibly falsify the outcomes." There is no
basis at all for asserting, or even believing, that such a thing is
possible. It is pure science fiction to dream that it can be done
"invisibly." Machines are tested, and if tampering has occurred it can
be found. If the machines have been altered, then forensic examination
can detect the alteration. He fails to mention that DRE machines have
been used in the United States for over 25 years without a single
verified incident in which the outcome of any election was altered
through tampering.
Later, Mr. Dugger misquotes me as having said that "computerized
vote-counting is highly vulnerable to fraud." I wrote many years ago,
and still believe, that punched-card voting, not DRE voting, was
vulnerable to fraud.
His most basic error, however, is in urging that paper systems are
safer than electronic ones. Since 1852, the New York Times has
published over 4000 articles on paper ballot fraud in the United
States. That works out to about one article every 12 days for the past
152 years. Paper is not safe. It may be familiar, but it is the
principal tool of election fraud in this country and always has been.
The answer is not to return to paper but to implement safeguards to
assure the public that the sorts of machinations Mr. Dugger imagines
are not possible in practice.
________________________________________________________________________
__________
Michael I. Shamos
Distinguished Career Professor, Language Technologies Institute
Director, Universal Library
Co-Director, Electronic Commerce degree program
4515 Newell-Simon Hall, Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-8193 (office phone) 412-268-6298 (office fax) 412-681-8398
(home phone)
Home page: http://euro.ecom.cmu.edu/people/faculty/mshamos
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/