[IP] more on On Kansas State -- Black and White and Mad All Over
Begin forwarded message:
From: Gerry Faulhaber <gerry-faulhaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: July 30, 2004 10:48:05 PM EDT
To: Tom Davis <tdavis@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Your IP post
Thanks for yor thoughtful response. I wish the original post had been
as thoughtful and complete, and I certainly would have responded
differently.
Prof. Gerald Faulhaber
----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Davis
To: gerry-faulhaber@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 11:12 PM
Subject: Your IP post
Dear Mr.. Faulhaber:
Saw your IP post. My son attends KSU, so I've followed this story.
First, the Student Press Law Center is an independent group in VA, not
in any way connected with KSU. The Chronicle of Higher Ed has covered
this story very well. Ron Johnson was given an exemplary job review
just 2-3 months before he was sacked. See below. President Wefald
should be ashamed of himself to sponsor this argument in court. Tom
Davis
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
From the issue dated July 2, 2004
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
http://chronicle.com/weekly/v50/i43/43a01001.htm
Black and White and Mad All Over
The ouster of Kansas State U.'s newspaper director has
college-journalism advisers seeing red
By ERIC HOOVER
Manhattan, Kan.
This spring Kansas State University published a job listing for an
interim director of student publications, inviting applicants who have
a master's degree in journalism or a related field and the ability to
"work well with students."
An ability to please all of the readers all of the time was not on that
list of requirements. But campus-media directors across the nation say
it might as well have been.
In May Kansas State ousted its longtime journalism adviser, Ron
Johnson, who had received a shining evaluation just two months earlier.
He contends that administrators' dissatisfaction with the coverage of
minority students in the student-run newspaper, the Collegian, was what
led to his dismissal. University officials maintain that it was a
personnel decision, not a question of content.
Mr. Johnson's removal is the latest flare-up in a continuing clash over
the role of collegiate newspaper advisers, who walk one of the
narrowest planks in academe.
Part teachers, part collaborators, part critics, advisers generally
lack the protections of mainstream faculty members, yet receive more
scrutiny. Because student newspapers are flash points for campus
tensions over many issues, media advisers often take heat -- and get
fired -- for decisions made by the student journalists they oversee but
do not control.
In April, for example, the trustees of Barton County Community College,
in Kansas, decided not to renew the contract of the campus newspaper's
adviser, Jennifer Schartz, after she had refused to stop the paper from
publishing a letter critical of the basketball coach. And in May,
Vincennes University reassigned its adviser, Michael Mullen, who says
the move was an attempt to silence the student newspaper, which had
published articles critical of the administration last semester.
(Officials of both colleges deny that the decisions were related to
news coverage).
More than other recent controversies, however, Mr. Johnson's dismissal
at Kansas State jolted the tight-knit ranks of media advisers. A
soft-spoken leader in the field, he had advised the Collegian for 15
years, a time during which the paper racked up many awards, including
one in March as best broadsheet daily in a national competition of
college newspapers. If such a decorated veteran could not keep his job,
was any adviser safe?
In 1998, in response to a growing number of adviser-administrator
confrontations, the College Media Advisers, a national organization
representing journalism instructors, established an "Adviser Advocate
Policy," which allows members to call on trained advocates for help in
resolving dispute with colleges.
Members of the group met with Kansas State officials this spring in an
effort to win Mr. Johnson's reinstatement. When that failed, the group
voted to censure the university, calling it "oppressive of students'
rights to free expression and hostile toward those professionals it
employs to advise the student press."
"I'm starting to worry that we're in an atmosphere of less tolerance,"
says Kathy Lawrence, the group's president, who is director of student
media at the University of Texas at Austin. "If an adviser can be
removed for the content of a student newspaper -- which they're not
supposed to control -- then we know there's a real serious problem
there, and a real serious problem for advisers in general."
'Turn Them Loose'
Ron Johnson understood the pressures of the profession when he stepped
into it two decades ago, back when he had a lot more hair and a
hankering for a job where the hours are as different as each day's
news.
After receiving a master's degree in journalism from the University of
Kansas in 1982, he taught high-school English for two years and worked
as a special-projects writer at the Wichita Eagle-Beacon for another
year. Then, in 1985, he traded his byline for a chance to teach
students who were still too young to drink how to break news and make
deadlines.
He became adviser to the student newspaper at his alma mater, Fort
Hays State University. Four years later he signed on as Kansas State's
director of student publications to oversee production of the
Collegian, which comes out Monday through Friday, with a circulation of
11,000, as well as of the university's yearbook, the Royal Purple, and
the campus telephone directory.
Mr. Johnson had a dual appointment, serving both as director of Student
Publications Inc., the nonprofit corporation that publishes the
newspaper, and as an assistant professor not on the tenure track, in
the university's A.Q. Miller School of Journalism and Mass
Communications.
He began each day by writing critiques of the previous day's issue of
the Collegian. Many nights ended with telephone calls from editors
seeking his advice. Students recall that when he took them aside to
criticize their work, he would preface his remarks by saying, "I love
you, but ...."
Some nights Mr. Johnson would drop by the newspaper's office, in Kedzie
Hall, with plates of warm chocolate-chip cookies. When high winds from
a tornado ripped a hole in the roof of the building, in the summer of
1993, he helped students salvage 6,000 copies of the newspaper from a
fast-flooding basement.
But he was hands-off about the content of the newspaper. As for many
other advisers, the job required him to lead young journalists without
giving them orders on what to report and write. At public colleges,
like Kansas State, the First Amendment prevents advisers from
interfering with media content because that would be tantamount to the
state's taking action to restrict free speech. "Legally speaking, an
adviser stands in the same shoes as a university president," says Mike
Hiestand, a lawyer based in Bellingham, Wash., who specializes in
student-media cases. "Once the adviser imposes some sort of directive
on editorial content, there's going to be a problem."
Mr. Johnson believes that journalism is a practice best learned by
students who are free to make mistakes. "You're giving advice, but
you're not pulling strings," he says of the adviser's role. "You train
'em and you turn them loose."
Tempest on a T-Shirt
Mr. Johnson's troubles began in February, following the 27th annual Big
12 Conference on Black Student Government, which drew more than 1,000
visiting students to Kansas State's campus. Natalie Rolfe, president of
the campus Black Student Union at the time, says members became upset
when the Collegian failed to cover any of the conference's events, most
of which had taken place in the student union, just across from the
building housing the newspaper's office.
Complaints among minority students about the Collegian's coverage of
diversity issues predated Ms. Rolfe's arrival at Kansas State, where 3
percent of the student population is black. But the lack of reporting
on the conference, which was held during Black History Month, prompted
her to act.
Ms. Rolfe helped organize two forums, on February 26 and March 2, at
which administrators, faculty members, and student leaders of campus
groups discussed their concerns about the Collegian with its editors.
Mr. Johnson attended the second meeting. A lack of diversity on the
newspaper was among their criticisms: The Collegian had no black staff
members last semester.
Some students demanded to know why the newspaper had given more
coverage to a campus rodeo this spring than to a gathering of black
student leaders.
"Every student wants to feel like they have a voice in the newspaper,"
says Ms. Rolfe, who graduated in May with a degree in journalism and
mass communications. "We were not trying to take away anybody's First
Amendment rights, but to put in a system to make sure the paper's more
friendly to the campus."
After the editors apologized -- both at the forums and in print -- for
not covering the conference, Mr. Johnson became the target of Ms.
Rolfe's continuing campaign. Her thinking was that students, who come
and go, were not solely to blame for what she describes as the
Collegian's long-term problems, and that a "regime change" was
necessary.
So she ordered dozens of orange T-shirts with a message on the front
-- "W.W.R.G.?," for "When Will Ron Go?" On April 7, she and about 50
other students donned the T-shirts and marched through the campus to
call for Mr. Johnson's resignation.
"He wasn't fixing anything," Ms. Rolfe says.
The students who challenged Mr. Johnson had the support of one of
Kansas State's top administrators, Myra Gordon, the associate provost
for diversity and dual-career development. Ms. Rolfe says that when she
first discussed her plans to hold the forums about the Collegian with
Ms. Gordon, the administrator told her, "I'm backing you all the way."
Ms. Gordon, who works regularly with students, stated publicly on at
least one occasion that Mr. Johnson should be removed from his job. In
late April, she told the Collegian that "nothing less than an enduring
solution" would defuse frustrations with the newspaper's coverage.
Ms. Gordon is a former associate dean at Virginia Tech, where she led a
controversial initiative in 1999 to diversify the faculty through
revamped hiring procedures that were designed to bring in more female
and minority professors (The Chronicle, July 12, 2002).
This spring some members of the Collegian's staff say they were stung
by what they describe as the associate provost's insinuations that they
-- and Mr. Johnson -- were racist. Ms. Gordon declined The Chronicle's,
request for a telephone interview. After saying she would consider
answering only written questions, she did not respond to questions sent
to her via e-mail.
'A Comprehensive Review'
In early April, the complaints about Mr. Johnson were buzzing in the
ears of Todd F. Simon, director of Kansas State's journalism school,
who had overseen Mr. Johnson in his roles as both media adviser and
assistant professor.
If Mr. Simon had concerns about the adviser, though, they had not shown
up in recent job reviews. In a March 15 evaluation, for instance, the
director concluded that Mr. Johnson "exceeds expectations" and deemed
his three-year performance "meritorious."
But in a May 7 letter to Stephen E. White, dean of the college of arts
and sciences, Mr. Simon recommended that Mr. Johnson not be reappointed
as adviser to the newspaper or to his teaching position.
Mr. Simon's letter followed a "content analysis" in which he attempted
to quantify the weaknesses of the Collegian by comparing it with six
other college newspapers. His conclusion: The Kansas State newspaper
"ranked low in many measures of news coverage," including stories with
a campus focus and in the number of sources per article.
He noted that the award the Collegian won in March was based on a
single day's newspaper, which, he wrote, was "not representative of a
typical issue." (His letter does not mention that the newspaper
recently won separate awards that were based on multiple issues.) Mr.
Simon wrote that although the recent complaints about the Collegian's
coverage of diversity were not the basis of his recommendation, the
"comprehensive review would not have occurred without the controversy
having arisen."
In an interview with The Chronicle, Mr. Simon explains that previously
he had not noticed what he describes as serious problems with the
Collegian, because he had been only "a casual reader" of the newspaper.
He contends that Mr. Johnson's concept of an adviser's role -- teaching
by sharing critiques after the fact -- is too narrow. In the director's
view, advisers should not "tell people, 'Go cover the following five
stories,' but they build up over time a response from students that
[the adviser] expects us to cover X, Y, and Z."
Mr. Simon, himself a longtime advocate of student-press freedom who
once threatened to sue on behalf of the Collegian when the student
government attempted to exercise control over the newspaper, rejects
accusations that he has trampled on First Amendment rights.
His concerns about Mr. Johnson, he says, were related not only to
content but also to conduct. In his letter to the dean, he wrote that
"dozens of individuals have offered opinions that are consistent in
their portrayal of Johnson as antagonistic, disrespectful, adversarial,
and distrustful. ..." Mr. Simon declined to offer more specifics in an
interview but insists that his findings were sound. "While this is a
dicey situation," he says, "I haven't stepped over the line."
A 'Feeling of Pride'
Katie Lane, a senior who was editor in chief of the Collegian last
semester, contends that Mr. Simon did go too far. She does not
understand why the journalism school's director, who consulted with
several student groups about Mr. Johnson this spring, did not seek the
opinions of the newspaper's staff members, many of whom rave about him.
Although she knew of a few students who did not like Mr. Johnson's
teaching style, she says, the vast majority supported him, as well as
his light advising touch. "When you walked into that newsroom, you knew
it was your paper," she says. "The feeling of pride in that is just
unbelievable."
Ms. Lane says the Collegian "dropped the ball" by not covering the
black-leadership conference, which she attributes to an oversight by
staff members. But, she adds, the newspaper has responded to the
criticism by developing a beat system and planning additional diversity
training.
Mark Witherspoon, editorial adviser at Iowa State University's student
newspaper, recently met with Kansas State officials to discuss Mr.
Johnson's case on behalf of the College Media Advisers. In addition to
lobbying for Mr. Johnson's reinstatement as adviser, the group is also
suggesting ways to improve the relationship between the university and
the newspaper.
Mr. Witherspoon sees some problems at Kansas State as structural. Under
the newspaper's current setup, for instance, Mr. Simon, an
administrator, is also chairman of the publications board, which is
supposed to function independently of the university. "There's some
intermingling there," Mr. Witherspoon says. "Papers become financially
independent so they can avoid this."
Amid criticism from students and alumni who support Mr. Johnson, the
university's president, Jon Wefald, recently signed a "declaration of
commitment" to the freedom of its student press, affirming that the
university would "never order or pressure an adviser to coerce a
student staff's editorial decisions."
Kansas State has temporarily shelved its search for an adviser after
the newspaper's governing board passed a resolution condemning Mr.
Johnson's removal, which occurred without its consent. Linda Puntney,
who was assistant director of student publications, has been named
acting director.
Ms. Puntney, who could not be reached for comment, told the Student
Press Law Center, a watchdog group, that she hoped the university would
reinstate Mr. Johnson. If his removal "is, in fact, a content-related
issue, we are in deep trouble at Kansas State University," she said.
"If it is not a content issue, I'd like to know more about what it is."
High Expectations
On a Thursday afternoon in June, Mr. Johnson's campus office is almost
empty. Although he is no longer the newspaper's adviser, a member of
the Collegian's summer staff drops in anyway to ask his advice on
getting an evasive source to talk. "What do you think would happen,"
the student asks, "if I just knocked on his door?"
Mr. Johnson lets the question linger. Clearly the student has decided
to go find out for himself.
For now, Mr. Johnson plans to remain at Kansas State. Mr. White, the
arts-and-sciences dean, moved him into a full-time teaching position in
the journalism school. Mr. White says that despite his concerns about
the professor's "interpersonal relationships with different groups,"
which he declines to describe, he is confident that Mr. Johnson is "a
very effective teacher."
Mr. Johnson says some of students' frustration with the Collegian is
inevitable. On a large campus, he argues, a newspaper cannot possibly
cover every group's event or every speaker who visits. That said, he
agrees that the newspaper's failure to report on the black-leadership
conference was a mistake. He also concedes that the Collegian could
have done a better job covering race issues in general and in
recruiting a more-diverse staff.
"I don't fault readers for having high expectations," he says.
But he does fault the university for not giving him the opportunity to
help students improve the newspaper or to respond to the
"interpersonal" issues to which Mr. White refers. Mr. Johnson insists
that he does not know what those issues are. "If these were problems,"
he says, "how come I was only hearing about it now?"
Mr. Simon, director of the journalism school, told The Chronicle that
giving Mr. Johnson another chance "wouldn't have led to the desired
result."
To the professor, that is further evidence that he is a casualty of
what he describes as the growing "customer-service mentality" of higher
education, in which campus controversies require scapegoats. "I have
every reason to believe the administration understands the role of
adviser," he says. "It's just that they're not accepting it."
Across the hall from his office, the Collegian's newsroom is silent,
but the ceiling has plenty to say. For decades graduating students have
scribbled messages and quotations on the tiles.
Mr. Johnson meanders, rattling off students' names as he squints up.
"That's good," he says, pointing at one inscription: "Fight fires with
words. Words are hotter than flames."
But none of the messages fits the mood better than the one that a
student wrote 10 years ago in black ink. "Newspapers," it reads, "will
always break your heart."
http://chronicle.com
Section: The Faculty
Volume 50, Issue 43, Page A10
Front page | Career Network | Search | Site map | Help
Copyright © 2004 by The Chronicle of Higher Education
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/