[IP] INTERVIEW WITH FCC COMMISSIONER POWELL
Begin forwarded message:
From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: July 7, 2004 10:08:52 PM EDT
To: Dewayne-Net Technology List <dewayne-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Dewayne-Net] INTERVIEW WITH FCC COMMISSIONER POWELL
Reply-To: dewayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
INTERVIEW WITH FCC COMMISSIONER POWELL
Michael K. Powell, a Republican, was nominated 31 July 1997 as a member
of the FCC by President William J. Clinton and confirmed by the U.S.
Senate on 28 October 1997. President George W. Bush appointed Powell
chairman of the FCC on 22 January 2001. Gartner Fellow Kenneth McGee
met recently with Chairman Powell in his Washington, DC, office to
discuss issues and policies concerning broadband, telecommunications,
media ownership and content issues and digital TV.
On Media ownership Powell said: Here's the truth: the ownership debate
is about nothing but content. Don't be fooled. I mean, this is my
greatest warning to the American public. It's easy to go after every
ill in society by claiming it's the media's fault. It's the American
pastime, right? Anything you don't like, it's the media's fault. What
scared me in that debate is that it's not about the ownership rules at
all. The vast majority of people don't even know what the rules say, to
be perfectly candid. Name all six of them. Name what they actually do.
Nobody can. They became a stalking horse for a debate about the role of
media in our society. I can expect and understand consumer anger and
anxiety about that. But the ownership rules are not the cause or the
cure. It was really an invitation for people with particular viewpoints
to push for a thumb on the scale, for content in a direction that
people preferred. The danger with that? It's easy to say, "I'm
comfortable with that when the government's doing it for something I
like. But I get really scared when it's something I don't." And what is
juxtaposed against the media ownership debate? Indecency, which maybe
is what you mean by content. Hollywood was happy to beat up on
ownership liberalization because they want the government to intervene
so we can promote more independent programming — which is content. But
the same Hollywood says the government can't say that Howard Stern
can't say the F word, because that's censorship and inappropriate.
[SOURCE: Gartner, a provider of research and analysis on the global IT
industry]
<http://www4.gartner.com/research/fellows/asset_91308_1176.jsp>
Archives at: <http://Wireless.Com/Dewayne-Net>
Weblog at: <http://weblog.warpspeed.com>
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/