[IP] Local Surveillance Program
Begin forwarded message:
From: EEkid@xxxxxxx
Date: June 12, 2004 8:45:30 PM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Local Surveillance Program
24-hour camera surveillance in city is part of bigger plan
Financed by homeland security grants, new network aimed at fighting
terrorists as much as drug dealers
By Doug Donovan
Sun Staff
Originally published June 10, 2004
From the Inner Harbor to the Bay Bridge, local and state homeland
security authorities are beginning to build a regional network of
24-hour surveillance cameras that will first go live this summer in
Baltimore.
The closed-circuit video surveillance system of public spaces will
begin in the Inner Harbor by summer's end, and a $2 million federal
grant accepted by the city yesterday will expand the cameras into
downtown's west side by early November.
"We're trying to build a regional network of cameras," said Dennis R.
Schrader, director of homeland security for Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.
What of privacy concerns raised by groups opposed to cameras constantly
monitored by retired police officers or college students?
"We're at war," Schrader said.
The network is part of a comprehensive strategy in the Baltimore area
to spend $25 million in homeland security grants this year and next to
improve regional cooperation on terrorism concerns. The idea stemmed
from a regional group of leaders that is jointly acquiring
decontamination equipment and backups for 911 and power systems.
The network of cameras will be placed in downtown's west side because
it has light rail and Amtrak lines, federal and state government
buildings, and many cultural institutions.
The city wants companies capable of building the system to submit bids
by the end of this month. "The purpose of the ... system is to provide
for the homeland defense ... while also reducing crime and public
disorder," reads the request for proposals. "Cameras will only observe
and record that which a police officer or private citizen could legally
see."
At a surveillance center in the Atrium Building on Howard Street, 13 to
15 retired police officers or criminal justice college students will
monitor images, said Elliot Schlanger, Baltimore's chief information
officer.
The system will be owned by the city and managed by Schlanger's office.
The network would be able to connect with the state's existing system
of closed-circuit cameras that monitor highways, he said.
Eventually, Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford and Howard
counties would plug their systems into the city's hub.
The city would also work to link its network with the closed-circuit
television systems in use by the University of Maryland, the Downtown
Partnership, Oriole Park at Camden Yards and other private institutions
on downtown's west side.
The network could also hook up to closed-circuit cameras in city
schools during a possible terrorist attack, according to the city's
request for proposals.
Before that network is built, the Baltimore Police Department will have
constructed a separate surveillance center to continuously monitor a
number of microwave cameras now being installed around the Inner
Harbor, said Kristen Mahoney, director of the Baltimore Police
Department's grants and government relations section, which handles
homeland security requests.
Mahoney and police officials visited London in November to examine the
United Kingdom's extensive use of such cameras.
Under the Inner Harbor plan, the cameras would be able to transmit
images to helicopters and, eventually, police cruisers, Mahoney said.
Dozens of surveillance cameras exist throughout downtown Baltimore to
deter crime, but those images are generally taped and reviewed only
occasionally. The new network, financed by grants from the Department
of Homeland Security, is aimed at fighting terrorists as much as drug
dealers.
Other cities -- Washington, D.C.; Tampa, Fla.; Jersey City, N.J.; and
Virginia Beach, Va. -- have built closed-circuit systems to help
monitor crime. But most, like Washington, activate and monitor the
systems mainly during events that attract large crowds, according to a
June 2003 report from the U.S. General Accounting Office.
The proposed Baltimore regional system, agreed to by an arm of the
Baltimore Metropolitan Council, could be one of the most extensive
undertaken in the nation, experts said.
"I have not heard of such a big project," said Cedric Laurant, policy
counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center. "We reject the
use of public video cameras in public places if ... used on a permanent
basis."
Arthur Spitzer, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union
of the National Capital Area, said his group fought Washington's system
and said the D.C. City Council curbed the Police Department's plan.
"This is the first one I've heard of where apparently they're planning
to put cameras around an urban area to keep them on all the time,"
Spitzer said of Baltimore's plan.
He said cameras infringe on privacy rights and are ineffective in
fighting either crime or terrorism.
"This is just another step toward Big Brother," he said. "One of the
freedoms that Americans take for granted is the freedom to walk down
the street without the government looking over your shoulder all the
time."
City Council President Sheila Dixon said she was concerned that the
federal grants would eventually run out and the city would be stuck
with the bill.
Mayor Martin O'Malley said the Downtown Partnership's use of cameras
has been successful and residents want to know why the city does not
use more cameras.
"You never want to have people operating cameras to look into windows,"
O'Malley said. "This is about being as proactive as you can be with the
limited police resources you have."
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/