[IP] Why Congress can't code good tech laws
http://news.com.com/2010-1014_3-5209091.html
Bad laws, bad code, bad behavior
May 10, 2004, 10:00 AM PT
By Declan McCullagh
A congressional hearing on Internet porn last week illustrates what happens
when politicians try to ban technology they don't like or understand.
The topic of Thursday's meeting of the House of Representatives' consumer
protection subcommittee was a bill intended to require that programs like
Kazaa and Grokster obtain parental consent before installation.
Peer-to-peer software is starting "to lure our children from the perceived
safety of the family living room out into the dangers of the Internet
wilderness," subcommittee chairman Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., warned.
The only problem: The bill that Stearns and his colleagues suggest as a
solution is so broadly worded that it regulates far more than just
peer-to-peer applications. Anyone distributing instant-messaging programs,
File Transfer Protocol software or Internet Relay Chat clients would have
to follow a complicated set of regulations to be published by the Federal
Trade Commission, which might as well be renamed the Federal Software
Regulatory Commission.
Software distribution sites like those of SourceForge and the Comprehensive
Perl Archive Network would be outlawed, if they did not follow these
byzantine legal rules, which include obtaining "verifiable parental
consent," if the downloader is a minor, ensuring that the software can be
readily uninstalled, keeping "records of its compliance" and so on. Anyone
running such a Web site outside the United States would be required to hire
a "resident agent" and file reports with the FTC--hardly a boon to the
burgeoning global open-source movement.
The so-called Protecting Children from Peer-to-Peer Pornography Act is just
one example of politicians attempting to write rules for software--often
with a worthwhile goal in mind--that end up hurting legitimate programmers,
network administrators and end users. In other words, state and federal
laws regulating technology often invoke an even more powerful rule: the law
of unintended consequences.
[...remainder snipped...]
_______________________________________________
Politech mailing list
Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
- Prev by Date:
[IP] Fwd: [CSL Colloq] Nano-Architectures, Nano-Computing, Nano-Technologies, and the * 4:15PM, Wed May 19, 2004 in Gates B03
- Next by Date:
[IP] more on New flaw takes Wi-Fi off the air
- Previous by thread:
[IP] Fwd: [CSL Colloq] Nano-Architectures, Nano-Computing, Nano-Technologies, and the * 4:15PM, Wed May 19, 2004 in Gates B03
- Next by thread:
[IP] more on New flaw takes Wi-Fi off the air
- Index(es):