[IP] Does ICANN need an ombudsman?
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: ICANN's missing ombuds (fixed typos)
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 18:13:06 -0500
From: Jonathan Zittrain <zittrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: declan@xxxxxxxx
Ethan Katsh is one of the most consummately reasonable people I've ever
met. He studies dispute resolution, and has quietly blandished ICANN for a
period of years to include a simple form of accountability in its
structure. He succeeded twice -- an older set of ICANN bylaws had a
section about chartering an independent review panel, and a set of
amendments in December '02 requires ICANN to have an ombudsperson. These
successes are rather hollow, since while pointing to these reforms in a
series of reports to the US Dept of Commerce and others, ICANN never
appointed the panel and hasn't hired an ombuds.
Ethan's description of the situation is laid out in a letter that's as
temperate as it is devastating: see <http://www.odr.info/icann/>. Politech
has followed ICANN's ups and downs since its inception; I wonder if anyone
out there has ideas about how to actually press the institution to be true
to its own rules -- or to offer a persuasive explanation about why it so
far hasn't. ...JZ
Jon Zittrain
Harvard Law School
Jack N. & Lillian R. Berkman Assistant Professor
for Entrepreneurial Legal Studies
Faculty Co-Director, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
<http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/zittrain>
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/