[IP] bits bytes?
Delivered-To: dfarber+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 22:25:41 -0500 (EST)
From: Rich Wiggins <wiggins@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [IP] Growth of the Internet May Take Nothing Short of a Revolution
To: Dave Farber <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>
Dave,
I thought perhaps Professor Zhang also proposed a revolution in
measuring data communications speeds, switching from bits to bytes.
However, his press release at CMU states that his goal is
100 megabits/second for 100 million homes. Megabits, not megabytes.
http://www.cmu.edu/cmnews/031120/031120_rewire.html
Odd that Gomes' article was off by a factor of 8 and it's being
reprinted by other papers and forwarded online with no one noticing.
/rich
>Portals
> From the Wall Street Journal --
>
>Growth of the Internet May Take Nothing Short of a Revolution
>by Lee Gomes
>
>A new and crucial chapter in the history of the Internet began last week.
>Expect all sorts of evolution vs. revolution battles before the chapter is
>finally written.
>
>Starting Tuesday, researchers from four big universities and other
>research outfits gathered on the Carnegie-Mellon campus in Pittsburgh for
>the initial planning session of the "100 by 100" consortium. With a $7.5
>million grant from the National Science Foundation, the group is spending
>the coming few years thinking about how to improve the Internet so that
>100 million U.S. homes can have everyday speeds of 100 megabytes a second.
..
>Most people think that improving network speeds is a simple matter of
>installing faster pipes. But Prof. Hui Zhang, the Carnegie Mellon
>computer-science professor who heads the consortium, says even with
>so-called fat pipes everywhere, today's Internet might not "scale up."
>
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/