[IP] ARRL's "private game preserve"
Delivered-To: dfarber+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 15:45:44 -0800
From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[Note: This comment comes from reader Steve Schear. DLH]
At 15:09 -0800 10/29/03, Steve Schear wrote:
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 15:09:56 -0800
To: "David P. Reed" <dpreed@xxxxxxxx>
From: Steve Schear <s.schear@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Dewayne-Net] ARRL's "private game preserve"
Cc: dewayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
At 15:26 -0500 10/29/03, David P. Reed wrote:
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 15:26:33 -0500
To: dewayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"Dewayne-Net Technology List" <dewayne-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "David P. Reed" <dpreed@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: ARRL's "private game preserve"
It's becoming increasingly clear to me that the ARRL (which does NOT
represent all hams) has begun to think of itself as a "spectrum owner" -
which it is NOT. Hams who are not ARRL members might want to file
amicus briefs making this clear to the courts - that the ARRL does not
necessarily represent their interests in the spectrum they hold licenses to.
As an R&D investment, the amateur bands appear to me to have had a piss
poor return in recent years - they have played very little role in
advancing the radio arts for a decade or more - instead they are
becoming a Luddite force that views anything new as bad.
A true spirit of amateur radio would not be working at protecting their
ancient radio systems from "harmful interference" - instead they would
be working on ways to share bands with new and more effective
technologies and high density deployments. They would not be working
to preserve "scarcity" but being constructive about solutions that
accomodate unbounded scaling of the number of users in a band - in other
words to create abundance.
If they can't be constructive, perhaps we should replace the amateur
bands with amateur radio NETWORKING bands, where unlicensed radio
networks that can scale are mandated.
Free the Ham Bands!
Here, here. A long ago let my ARRL membership lapse. I lost interest in
dealing with the on-line prima donnas that frequent their ranks. All the
fun radio stuff (e.g., truly random FFH in HF for anti-fade) is prohibited
in the ham bands. Any radio enthusiast who wants to advance the radio arts
will likely be playing in the unlicensed bands or operating outside the
regulations in the amateur bands.
steve
Archives at: <http://Wireless.Com/Dewayne-Net>
Weblog at: <http://weblog.warpspeed.com>
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/