Delivered-To: dfarber+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:41:59 -0700
From: bill <bill@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ...
Sender: owner-ietf@xxxxxxxx
To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Depends on if you have wildcarded MX records as well too.
The mail might never bounce. Who is to say a clever spammer wouldn't
setup a wildcarded series of MX records to point to their own SMTP
servers, and harvest the FROM/REPLY TO addresses and place them in to
their spam lists. (obviously the TO field is wrong, since it's domain
bounced - however I wonder if you could take the @part.com and look for
valid domains that come close to matching and add THOSE TO: fields to
the spam directory)
An even WORSE difference in behavior (plus you aren't notified that your
mail didn't make it to where you thought it was going)
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf@xxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ietf@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Doug
Royer
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 2:26 PM
To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Asrg] Verisign: All Your ...
Before the change if I email user@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, the email tool would
tell me immedatally
that no such host exists.
Now, it unconditionally sends the email, then later bounces. This is a
HUGE difference
in behaviour.
--
Doug Royer | http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------
Doug@xxxxxxxxx | Office: (208)612-INET
http://Royer.com/People/Doug | Fax: (866)594-8574
| Cell: (208)520-4044
We Do Standards - You Need Standards