[IP] Microsoft ordered to search for "deleted" e-mails
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 07:02:57 -0400
From: Barry Ritholtz <britholtz at maximgrp dot com>
Subject: Microsoft ordered to search for "deleted" e-mails
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
(please show my email as follows: britholtz at maximgrp dot com
Hi Dave,
Here's the follow up to the Cringley article about Microsoft and the
deleted e-mails; If you recognize Judge Motz's name, its because he is
also handling the Sun Microsystems v Microsoft case. That's the case where
Microsoft was ordered to archive all its email, starting in 2000.
As you can imagine, if they defied his previous order achival order, he's
going to be none-too-happy with Redmond; It also puts the lawyers in the
uncomfortable situation of trying to defend the undefendable. As someone
who has studied this company over the years, I have to say I continue to be
mystified by some of the silly foibles they manage to find themselves in
time and again. (As previously disclosed, I am on the BoD of Burst)
Regards,
Barry L. Ritholtz
Market Strategist
Maxim Group
britholtz at maximgrp dot com
(212) 895-3614
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Big Picture: A blog of capital markets, geopolitics, with a dash of film!
http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments
Microsoft ordered to look for deleted e-mails
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/138857_msftburst10.html
Burst.com lawsuit is one of several filed by competitors since monopoly ruling
By JAMES ROWLEY
BLOOMBERG NEWS
WASHINGTON -- A U.S. judge has ordered Microsoft Corp. to search for any
deleted e-mails that might help Burst.com Inc. win a lawsuit claiming its
technique for broadcasting music and video on the Internet was stolen by
the Redmond company.
Burst shares have jumped almost 75 percent since the judge issued the edict
Aug. 28 at a hearing in Baltimore where the software company's lawyer,
Spencer Hosie, complained that there were "profound gaps" in the 140 boxes
of e-mails that Microsoft turned over in pretrial proceedings. A transcript
of the hearing obtained by Bloomberg News showed that U.S. District Judge
J. Frederick Motz ordered Microsoft to search 25,000 backup computer tapes
to determine whether they contain deleted e-mails pertinent to Burst's
lawsuit.
If Burst can show Microsoft executives destroyed documents, Motz may
instruct the jury that it's free to assume the truth of some of Burst's
allegations, legal experts said. They said that, in turn, might prompt
Microsoft to settle with Burst, which is seeking unspecified triple damages
for the alleged misappropriation of its patented technology.
"What would be the point of going into court with your hands cuffed on the
facts?" said Andrew Gavil, an antitrust expert at Howard University's law
school in Washington, of Microsoft's potential predicament. "There is a lot
of law out there that you have a special obligation to retain information .
. . "
Burst's lawsuit is one of four by Microsoft competitors filed after a U.S.
appeals court ruled in 2001 that the company illegally protected its
Windows monopoly. Microsoft has settled suits brought by AOL Time Warner
Inc. and Be Inc., which agreed last week to accept a $23 million payment to
drop its claims. Sun Microsystems Inc., which seeks more than $1 billion,
also sued Microsoft.
Burst claims that Microsoft interfered with its attempt to demonstrate its
software by broadcasting over the Internet a concert of the Irish rock bank
U2. Burst said Microsoft released a new version of its Windows Media
Player just before the concert so that consumers who used Windows Media
Player 7.0 couldn't view the concert.
At the Aug. 28 hearing, Motz rejected Microsoft's argument that it's unfair
to burden the company with an e-mail search based on "conjecture" the
computer tapes might yield evidence executives discussed incorporating
Burst.com's streaming media software into Microsoft products.
"It's a burden of Microsoft's own making," Motz said, according to the
transcript. "This is a problem that is going to face a lot of corporations.
If they're in areas where litigation is a likelihood, they've got to store
their documents in a way they're readily retrievable."
Microsoft lawyer John W. Treece told Motz that "Burst's accusations of
purposeful destruction is based upon pure speculation." Microsoft employees
"may have deleted their e-mails as a matter of course," Treece said,
predicting the search "is highly unlikely to be successful." Motz told
Microsoft to begin searching e-mail for three of six executives who dealt
with Burst.
"Microsoft has been forthcoming in providing evidence and will continue to
cooperate," Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler said. He called Burst's
allegations "without merit," adding that "Microsoft has innovated with
digital technology in Windows for more than 10 years." At the hearing Aug.
28, Hosie said Microsoft executives who attended seven meetings with Burst
officials deleted e-mails they would have written shortly before and after
the sessions as is customary.
"We see it time and again the thing that should generate e-mail traffic
have not. There's no e-mails produced," Hosie said. "This is a company that
lives and dies on its e-mails. It just isn't possible. These are not
conjectural gaps. They are very real gaps." Hosie said company lawyers
found 70 e-mails from Microsoft executives to Burst executives that weren't
included in the material Microsoft provided.
Motz instructed Microsoft to begin searching computer tapes for files of
Will Friedman, the former Microsoft executive who was the company's liaison
with Burst, and expand it to include others, including Senior Vice
President William Poole.
**********************************************************************
This message is intended only for use by the intended party and may contain
information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, then any review, dissemination, replication or
distribution of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
delete this message and all attachments.
Electronic communications routed to any employee of Maxim Group LLC
("Maxim") are for business purposes only. While messages are confidential,
authorized management, legal and compliance personnel may review
electronic messages. Electronic messages are also retained and would be
provided upon request to an authorized regulatory body.
Do not use email or instant messaging to request, authorize or effect the
purchase or sale of any security, to send fund transfer instructions or to
effect any other transactions. Maxim does not accept responsibility for
transmission via electronic means of trade orders. No guarantee can be made
by Maxim of timely execution of any trade order transmitted via electronic
means including email and instant messaging.
Information included in this email does not constitute a trade confirmation
or an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy/sell securities. Past
performance is not indicative of future returns.
**********************************************************************
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/