[At-Large] ICANN's Internet for the Rich vs. WSIS Internet for the People
The real issue is IIC: to evalutate to which degree ICANN has already
been captured, while they head for an "Internet for the Rich", and
what can competition be, that ICANN is to foster, except for we, the
people, to deploy an "Internet for the People" by the people along
with international standards and fair trade rules and agreements.
As true @large, i.e. Internet lead users, we are interested in four
key points :
- an Internet (with an anonymised and protected permanent address)
- an open semantic addressing in continuity with an open, stable,
coherent and multilingual DNS
- non-captured and intergoverned specialised enhanced cooperations
based upon subsidiarity and proportionality principles.
- a distributed open IANA and innovative architectural evolution.
Todate, I am afraid ICANN is not heading towards any of that
directions. I gave yesterday the time constraints france@large has.
Will ALAC want to work on something or not. Will GNSO/GA consider the
DNS parts of these points ?
ALAC mailing list
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org