Re: [governance] [ga] Re: Establishment of the EuropeanRegionalAt-Large Organizaton
Danny,
as you are quite well aware - since you quote to ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -
I will not respond to your mail, which you have sent to mailing
lists, where only you have the right to post.
Your behaviour is quite unethical, and the alusions you are spreading
will not drive me from the main discussion here - and it's not what
ICANN does or does not. If you are interested to influence the ICANN
processes, you should be well aware how to do that, and it's
certainly not via the mailing list of the IG caucus.
You keep on insulting people who are trying to do something - take
Vittorio for example. Where do you wanna go with this behaviour I
don't know, but we all see your actions.
veni
At 07:33 22-01-06 -0800, Danny Younger wrote:
>Veni,
>
>This thread was initiated by an ALAC announcement.
>
>As you know, the At-Large Advisory Committee was
>formally established by way of the ICANN bylaws
>effective as of 15 December 2002.
>
>The bylaws also call for the following:
>
>The Board shall cause a periodic review, if feasible
>no less frequently than every three years, of the
>performance and operation of each Supporting
>Organization, each Supporting Organization Council,
>each Advisory Committee (other than the Governmental
>Advisory Committee), and the Nominating Committee by
>an entity or entities independent of the organization
>under review... The consideration by the Board
>includes the ability to revise the structure or
>operation of the parts of ICANN being reviewed by a
>two-thirds vote of all members of the Board.
>
>As we have now exceeded the three-year time span
>recommended for Advisory Committee Review, and as both
>operational and structural issues pertaining to this
>advisory committee remain a source for concern for
>many in the community, may we ask when ICANN will
>commence the overdue review required by the bylaws?
>
>If this hasn't yet been scheduled, may we ask you to
>add this item to the agenda of the next ICANN Board
>meeting so that the public at large through the
>comment process may at some point be given its
>opportunity to formally make its sentiment known?
>
>Best regards,
>Danny
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>_______________________________________________
>governance mailing list
>governance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance