Re: [ga] Google's SafeSearch is overzealous, blocks innocuous domains
Nainil and all former DNSO GA members or other interested stakeholders/users,
Your exactly right here Nainil. And what you suggested here again,
is what I had essentially suggested two days ago on this thread as well.
But thank you for yet again repeating same...
nainil@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi -joop-,
>
> This could be one solution. But how many humans can handle the enormous
> amount of error requests. If you consider, the number of sites affected by
> this act of GOOGLE, it is practically impossible for it to keep humans. Also,
> what if there is an error done by the people hired by Google, "Manual data
> entry sytem could be a big issue". Plus --> Google would need to design a new
> interface for it's people to address the issue and make changes in the
> database.
>
> The database of google is so big that writing a small code also requires lot
> of manpower and a very efficient code. Better than that: 1. Google changes
> it's current SafeSearch code to a more efficient one 2. OR Google for the
> time being stops SafeSearch option. It would just need to disable the
> SafeSearch Module.
>
> Thanks.
>
> ==================================
> Best Regards,
> Nainil Chheda.
> Eliteral - A Web Site Hosting Co.
> Founder & Ex-Proprietor.
> http://www.eliteral.com/
> Addr: 3900 City Line Avenue Apt,
> D827 - Madison Bldg,
> Philadelphia, PA. 19131, USA.
> (H)Phone: 1-267-295-5470.
> (O)Phone: 1-215-204-2029.(10AM - 3PM)
> FAX: 1-215-204-3101
> Email ONLY: nainil.c@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Email ONLY: nainil.c@xxxxxxxxxx
> MSN: nainil@xxxxxxxxxxx
> YAHOO: nainil@xxxxxxxxx
> ==================================
> (SEO - Search Engine Optimizer)
> Web Hosting Pennsylvania
> ==================================
>
> How many cares one loses when one decides not to be something but to be
> someone. - Coco Chanel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Joop Teernstra
> Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2004 9:02 PM
> To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ga] Google's SafeSearch is overzealous, blocks innocuous domains
>
> At 04:54 p.m. 24/04/2004, Nainil Chheda wrote:
>
> >SafeSearch also marked as unsafe for children JewishSussex.com, a
> >religious Web site; EssexCountyBeeKeepers.org of Topsfield, Mass.;
> >BluesExcuse.SouthBurnett.com.au, an Australian blues band's site;
> >BassExpert.com; and the Anglo-Saxon history site RomansInSussex.co.uk.
>
> Looks like teething trouble of the new service, rather than "the code
> becoming the law".
> As long as the code is not smarter, what Google needs to do is set up a
> complaints' address with a few humans who check the sites over.
>
> -joop-
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.664 / Virus Database: 427 - Release Date: 4/21/2004
>
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
Pierre Abelard
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827