Re: [ga] In Memorium: Hans Kraaijenbrink
Secretariat, Michael, and all former DNSO GA members or interested
stakeholders/users,
GNSO SECRETARIAT wrote:
> [To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> [To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>
> Posted by kind permission of Michael Palage.
>
> Hello All:
>
> For those new Board members or staff that did not have the opportunity to
> personally know Hans, I thought I would try to attempt to capture the
> essence of the person that I had gotten to know over the past several years
> in the following words. Hans was on the original ICANN Board of Directors
> and he helped sheppard ICANN through its initial formation and its evolution
> and reform. Despite his unwavering support of ICANN the institution, he was
> vilified by many of ICANN's critics and became a lightening rod for their
> attacks. To these critics Hans will always be known as the last of the ICANN
> Board Squatters.
Hans was not elected nor desired by the stakeholder/user community
or any sector thereof. As such his sitting on the ICANN BoD of a
public resource organization is picarious at best given the White
paper and MoU. Same is true of all of the board squatters. As
such they should requse themselves accordingly, regardless of
their merit to serve and/or sit as.
In favor of Hans, yes as you rightly point out Michael, Hans is
a lightning rod, and for good reason...
>
>
> However, it is in this light that one finds the true essence of who Hans
> really was. Hans always "listened" to the community and consider all the
> facts surrounding an issue. However, once he made up his mind he stood by it
> regardless of how unpopular it was. No amount of lobbying could sway him
> once he made up his mind.
The issue's regarding Hans is not a matter of lobbying as you spin
it here Michael, but a matter of reason and judgment in listening
to the majority opinion. As a BoD member Hans should know that
if a majority opinion or measured consensus in known, your own
opinion must sway. Hans does not seem to recognize that fact
or reality. As such to a degree, ICANN has and shall continue
to be in a disruptive position with the growing majority of
Stakeholders/users...
>
>
> After hearing of this tragic news, I thought back to the last substantive
> conversation that Hans and I had. It was in Montreal at the VeriSign
> registry cocktail party. Hans, Paul Kane, and myself were outside having a
> philosophical argument over the ccNSO. The discussion was "lively." At the
> conclusion of the discussion, Hans leaned over to me and told me that this
> was the fun that lied ahead of me as a director over the next couple of
> years, and that although a lot of work had been done, much more remained.
>
> The last couple of months have been challenging for me as I try to find my
> place as a director. Although Vint joked during last Friday's Board meeting
> about me being with next Andy/Karl with regard to my abstentions, I always
> viewed myself as a tenacious Hans with Louis Touton's knowledge of where all
> the skeletons were buried. This was a joke that I have shared with many
> people over the past several months. However, in light of the tragic and
> untimely loss of Han, I instead view this as a unique opportunity over the
> next two years to pay tribute to Hans' memory.
>
> While many of us that knew Hans personally try to cope with this loss, I
> think Hans the consummate professional would not want us not to lose focus
> of the obligations to ICANN the institution. Specifically, finding a
> successor for him as the Chair of the Nominating Committee. This is a very
> important position, and one that Hans was uniquely positioned to fulfill.
> Finding a new Chair will not be easy, but one which we must attend to in
> short term.
>
> Finally, I also strongly support Tom Niles's recommendation that any
> communication be made in English and Dutch.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Michael D. Palage
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
Pierre Abelard
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is
less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801