<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Good work by GNSO on sTLDs



Title: Help
I think the GNSO Council did well, in challenging the ICANN Board over its 13th October pronouncement that the next sTLDs were to be shelved.
 
The resolution the GNSO Council hammered out in Carthage was needed and constructive, and I find it encouraging that the ICANN Board did a U-turn afterwards and re-instated the proposed introduction of more sTLDs.
 
Of greater long-term significance is the evolution of a programme and process to introduce many more gTLDs, and to have that process ready by the end of 2004. The language of the Board seemed to indicate that they were now finally getting ready to open the doors to significant additional gTLDs. And that this will occur not in 'rounds' of TLD selection, but as and when a potential registry seeks to apply. There will be criteria, and if the registry satisfies the criteria, then it will operate.
 
Clearly the coming consultations and work are important to define the process by which this will take place, and the GNSO has a central role in this. Maybe I am being over-optimistic, but I picked up the sense that a hard-pressed Paul Twomey and ICANN were finally wanting to really involve their constituencies in a more bottom-up process.
 
If ICANN wants people from all constituencies to pull together and 'start a new phase' of co-operation, then it needs to 'take the risk' of trusting a little more, and embracing openness and greater responsiveness.
 
A further big step forward would be for ICANN to recognise the significant credibility *and support* it could gain by 'individualising' ALAC - in other words by actively promoting the principle of one-person-one-vote in all its RALOs, and thereby starting to attract the significant numbers of At Large participants who could make a useful and informed contribution to ICANN's processes, while adding to its legitimacy.
 
If the ALAC and its RALOs were to be developed along a democratic model (rather than an organisation-based model); and if ICANN recognised the significance of the Internet Users by restoring (say) 2 At Large representatives to the Board (elected from verified individual members of each RALO or by democratically elected delegates); then it would be possible to see an At Large constituency which was more than just the present role-play, and indeed capable of supporting ICANN's processes and work. A much larger number of people would think it was worth joining and participating.
 
The ICANN Board started to give some ground at Carthage and even (horror! shock!) showed signs of listening and looking for help from others. Paul Twomey showed intelligence and ability in his deliveries and presentations. If ICANN could only build on this trust, and truly embrace bottom-up principles, then we could (against expectations) be entering a phase of co-operation and legitimacy.
 
That *has* to be the sensible and only way to proceed.
 
At present, that has all to be proved. But I thought the GNSO Council did well in helping to get the sTLD decision reversed.
 
Thanks!
 
...
 
Richard Henderson