<<< Date Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] request for details about ALAC members

To: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ga] request for details about ALAC members
From: Eric Dierker <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 19:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: donbrown_l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, andy@xxxxxx, icann-board@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3F88A513.59926466@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3F88A513.59926466@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I do not believe it was conceived in good faith.
It was politically expediant at the time.
Eric

> 
>   The ALAC was conceived in good faith but subverted early on
> and is illegitimate as anything close to representing any and all
>stakeholders/users and seems to desire to remain so.
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ga] request for details about ALAC members
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [ga] request for details about ALAC members
  - From: Jeff Williams

References:
- Re: [ga] request for details about ALAC members
  - From: Jeff Williams

Prev by Date: Re: [ga] VeriSign fends off critics at ICANN confab and ALAC's ligitimacy
Next by Date: Re: [ga] VeriSign fends off critics at ICANN confab and ALAC's
Previous by thread: Re: [ga] request for details about ALAC members
Next by thread: Re: [ga] request for details about ALAC members
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread