<<< Date Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Why ALAC lacks legitimacy

To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ga] Why ALAC lacks legitimacy
From: Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 22:14:08 -0500
In-reply-to: <3F84E848.6C5F6E22@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


On Wednesday, October 8, 2003, at 11:47  PM, Jeff Williams wrote:

And I would
add that Adventure.com is hardly a "Big Business", now is it???

It's edventure.com , Cybersquatting on the domain, I believe, sinceit's a registered TM.


Bad faith?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ga] Why ALAC lacks legitimacy
  - From: Jeff Williams
- Re: [ga] Why ALAC lacks legitimacy
  - From: George Kirikos

References:
- Re: [ga] Why ALAC lacks legitimacy
  - From: Jeff Williams

Prev by Date: Re: [ga] Why ALAC lacks legitimacy
Next by Date: [ga] Re: 10,000 foot view of DNS/Sitefinder/Verisign
Previous by thread: Re: [ga] Why ALAC lacks legitimacy
Next by thread: Re: [ga] Why ALAC lacks legitimacy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread