Re: [ga] Vint Cerf opposed to users being redirected to search engines
Ha! Now Teilhard de Chardin was fantastic! He took Duns Scotus's idea of
"haecittas" and developed it into a modern theology... what you might call
"ordered complexification"!
Personally, I love the "thisness" of all the websites on the net, and the
way the Internet can refer to a sum greater than all its parts, because of
the interactions which it positively incites.
As for governance or ownership (or property rights...)
Who can own the recalcitrant human mind? And yet in the multiplicities of
the human genius, you can see the implications of great beauty. (Not quite
the same language as the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ of ICANN or the DNS suppliers,
admittedly)
yrs,
Richard H
----- Original Message -----
From: J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Dan Steinberg <synthesis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Karl Auerbach
<karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: L. Gallegos <jandl@xxxxxxxxx>; <ga@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] Vint Cerf opposed to users being redirected to search
engines
> At 16:19 06/09/03, Dan Steinberg wrote:
> >I agree with Karl that many (if not most) users of the web do not care
> >about the religious purity of the experience and more about finding what
> >they want.
>
> Dan,
> what millions of brains aournd the world do with, understand of, engineers
> from the software is what one names "brainware" - what Telihard de Chardin
> has annouced as the "noosphere".
>
> >More to the point, it seems to me that none of us (not even the mighty
> >ICANN) has the right nor the power to control what happens in this
> >instance. At the desktop???? I think not. In fact...I'm sure not.
>
> The brainware can be influenced, suggested ideas, mostly at the begining
of
> a new conept taught correct or wrong beliefs by press, education,
> government attitudes etc. one says "influed", the same as "programmed" for
> software and "designed" for hardware.
>
> One exemple of brainware influing is the root system: making the world
> believe one needs a real time access to 13 (now a little more) machines
> under ICANN control, to get updated a file mostly known as being refused
to
> be updated by ICANN, everyone can update via FTP, and which represents in
> size 1% or less than the virus tables everyone maintains on his machine.
>
> Today after ICANN the brainware master is Microsoft. And this is the
reason
> of its importance. If BG says or develop something most of the people will
> accept and trust it is the way it must be done in a world lead by Windows.
> There are some ICANN sects, there are IETF chapels but there is a leading
> M$ church.
>
> jfc
>
>
> Karl Auerbach wrote:
>
> >>On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, L. Gallegos wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>The link below requires a subscription to wsjonline. If anyone knows
of
> >>>any other articles reporting this opinion by Mr. Cerf, I'd like to see
it.
> >>>
> >>
> >>In case anywone has not noticed, Microsoft's Internet Exploder^H^H^Hrer
> >>comes from the factory with "search" enabled.
> >>
> >>There is a long road between what a user enters into a browser's
"address
> >>bar" and what is seen in the browser windows. Along that road the
user's
> >>entry may evolve considerably.
> >>
> >>Microsoft has given itself priority places along that roadway, but we
> >>have seen others, new.net being but one, who also have made use of the
> >>place between the address bar and the window.
> >>
> >>I seriously doubt that many web users care much about the religious
purity
> >>of domain names; I suggest that users care, instead, much more about
> >>finding what they want.
> >>
> >> --karl--
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >--
> >Dan Steinberg
> >
> >SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
> >35, du Ravin phone: (613) 794-5356
> >Chelsea, Quebec fax: (819) 827-4398
> >J9B 1N1 e-mail:synthesis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >---
> >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> >Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 19/08/03
>
>