Re: [ga] PLEASE COMMENT: Suggested ALAC response to sTLD RFP

To: "<ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>George Kirikos" <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ga] PLEASE COMMENT: Suggested ALAC response to sTLD RFP
From: L Gallegos <jandl@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:58:03 +0000
In-reply-to: <20030828232330.34603.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030828232330.34603.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: jandl@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

Define "success."  What are the criteria?

I've yet to see that done.

Leah


On Thursday 28 August 2003 11:23 pm, you wrote:
But, I'm free to be convinced that
> any new TLDs are successful, given an objective metric.
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ga] PLEASE COMMENT: Suggested ALAC response to sTLD RFP
  - From: George Kirikos

Prev by Date: Re: [ga] PLEASE COMMENT: Suggested ALAC response to sTLD RFP
Next by Date: Re: [ga] PLEASE COMMENT: Suggested ALAC response to sTLD RFP
Previous by thread: Re: icannatlarge.org (was RE: [ga] PLEASE COMMENT: Suggested ALAC re sponse to sTLD RFP)
Next by thread: Re: [ga] PLEASE COMMENT: Suggested ALAC response to sTLD RFP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread