dear denise,
we are the ones who would give the "sample MOU text" to the group tomorrow
without having discussed it in ALAC. I do not think that we should do it that way.
Annette
ICANN At-Large <michel@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 10.07.05 00:12:46:
Vittorio Bertola wrote:
ICANN At-Large ha scritto:
In any case, I think it is a useful effort, but perhaps it's better if
we first discuss draft texts among ourselves, then we share them with
the Structures. Actually, in the conf call we had a couple of months
ago, we discussed whether we wanted to use this meeting as the moment
when we would draft Bylaws and MoU, or just to launch the process, and
even if I initially supported the first idea, it was agreed that we'd
better first have a general discussion. So I would avoid entering into
MoU details, also given that I'm not sure whether all of us think that
the current set of ALSes is sufficient to start incorporating the RALO.
Again, I would suggest that the sample MOU text simply be used as an
example to help orient the discussion towards the objective of actually
creating a RALO. The current set of ALSs in Europe meet the bylaw
requirements and can create a RALO now if they so choose. It is, of
course, their responsibility, not the ALAC's, to sign an MOU and launch
a RALO.
Thanks.
Denise
michel@xxxxxxxxx