Re: [FYI] Matthew Broersma : Software patent limits 'go too far'

To: debate@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [FYI] Matthew Broersma : Software patent limits 'go too far'
From: Peter Kuhm <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 16:42:16 +0200
In-reply-to: <2998690000.1064672782@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:debate-help@lists.fitug.de>
List-id: <debate.lists.fitug.de>
List-post: <mailto:debate@lists.fitug.de>
List-subscribe: <mailto:debate-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
Mailing-list: contact debate-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <3F75B344.19412.16B869@localhost> <3F75B344.19412.16B869@localhost>

At 16:26 27.09.03 +0200, Alvar Freude wrote:

>Gibt es einen triftigen Grund denen die Formulierung von Gesetzen zu
>überlassen, deren GEschäftsmodell eben diese Gesetze sind?

Nein.

Ciao,
Peter 


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: debate-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: debate-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- [FYI] Matthew Broersma : Software patent limits 'go too far'
  - From: Axel H Horns
- Re: [FYI] Matthew Broersma : Software patent limits 'go too far'
  - From: Alvar Freude

Prev by Date: Re: [FYI] Matthew Broersma : Software patent limits 'go too far'
Next by Date: Re: [FYI] Matthew Broersma : Software patent limits 'go too far'
Previous by thread: Re: [FYI] Matthew Broersma : Software patent limits 'go too far'
Next by thread: Re: [FYI] Matthew Broersma : Software patent limits 'go too far'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread