I copy the Council list, as we need to begin prioritizing all
the various work before us, immediately. In my view, this Work Team meeting
should not be planned unless the Council decides it is a bigger priority for a
face to face meeting than all of our other priorities, in particular the STI
response to the Board, the RAP-WG, the RAA drafting team, etc.
From:
owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 4:43 PM
To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Feedback requested - PDP-WT face to face
meeting
Dear All,
As discussed during our meeting, in order to move the proposal for a face to
face meeting forward, I’ll be developing a workplan outlining the objectives
and expected deliverables of such a meeting in order to obtain internal
approval. As discussed, the idea would be to provide travel funding for one
active WT representative from each constituency / stakeholdergroup or AC/SO.
Remote participation will be arranged for those that will not be able to attend
in person. To move this forward and complete this plan, I would like to request
the following information:
- In
order to determine the most appropriate and cost-effective meeting venue
and have an indication of the number of participants that will require
funding, could you please send me the name of the proposed funded
representative from your constituency / stakeholdergroup / AC/SO and the
location from where this person will be travelling
- Please
complete the following doodle (see http://www.doodle.com/u6ta33ik4r5mk52g)
so we can try to find a meeting date that is most convenient to all.
Please note that the idea is to have a 1,5 – 2 day meeting.
Please let me know if you have any further questions.
Best regards,
Marika