To cover the ongoing discussion it is intended to withdraw the
motion on the amendment and amend the motion itself in the way as
attached.
I'll insert a revision deadline after having coordinated with the
work team.
Is that acceptable?
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-
council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
Gesendet: Sonntag, 25. Oktober 2009 02:00
An: Rosette, Kristina; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [council] Motion to Adopt Updated Council Operating
Procedures
The motion to amend the motion specifically deals with the
abstention issue. If the amendment does not pass, then we could add
language like that.
Chuck
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-
council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2009 8:51 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Motion to Adopt Updated Council Operating
Procedures
All,
It is my understanding from our discussion yesterday that we had
rough consensus on voting to adopt the updated Council Operating
Procedures, but to state in the motion that certain areas remain
outstanding (e.g., abstentions) and to require that those areas be
priority work to be completed by a date certain.
Two questions:
1. Is that correct?
2. What areas, other than abstentions, remain outstanding?
I'll start drafting a substitute motion once I've heard back from
enough of you so that I'm comfortable I'm on the right track.
K
<Motion-RoP_draft_rev.doc>