<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Board letter to GNSO Council




Dear Bruce,

In this case since the main dinner subject is centered on the Board letter, I am more then happy to have someone from the Board give us an introduction to its thinking before releasing people to get food and the 'social "break-out"'

Would you be interested in giving us the Board's view on the Specific Trademark Issues as a way to kick off the discussions. We could then have a Q&A and then
allow people to start dinner.

a.



On 19 Oct 2009, at 11:39, Bruce Tonkin wrote:


Hello All,

In terms of availability to discuss the Board letter to the GNSO - I am
planning to arrive in Seoul on Thursday afternoon 22 Oct, and could be
available to meet with any subgroup of the GNSO on the Friday 23 Oct -
for anyone that is in town early. I find my weekend is now nearly fully packed with meetings - so thought I would allocate Friday to be able to talk to staff and other people arriving early to discuss how to make the best use of the meeting time during the week on important issues such as
trademarks.

For example - we could allocate some time during the Board/GNSO dinner
for a more structured discussion on the trademark issues/GNSO letter -
rather than purely chatter at each table.

I am not sure that the current format maximises the benefit of
Board/GNSO Council meeting time on an important topic. It is currently working as a useful occasion for Board/Council to get to know each other
a little better.


In the past I find more social engagements such as dinner etc - work
after a more formal session (short e.g 30 mins) where the context for
the issue is set and some of the concerns are raised - then the social
"break-out" function allows those with differing views to get together
and discuss in more detail informally.

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin