RE: [council] Board letter to GNSO Council
Pending RySG approval, Jeff Neuman and I are willing to participate on such a
drafting team; there could be others interested from the RySG. I should be
able to free up some time on Saturday afternoon.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 8:46 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] Board letter to GNSO Council
>
>
>
> On 15 Oct 2009, at 14:23, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
>
> > If we do decide to go for a DT,
>
> I think this is a good idea as a way to start and fits
> patterns that have proven successful in taking the first
> steps in recent efforts.
>
> I do not want to wipe the weekend end schedule for this,
> however, as we have a published agenda for the weekend and
> have people committed to those tasks who are planing to come
> to Seoul in time or those meetings.
>
> This does not minimize the importance of starting on the
> Board letter on Specific Trademark Issues (STI) and DAGv3 and
> that is why I think the suggestion about forming a DT a good
> idea. Because of the press of time, we cannot wait for a
> meeting to do this. So I am suggesting we start now.
>
> I propose forming a DT composed of participants each SG and
> the active Liaison groups who are willing to focus their time
> next week (perhaps even finding time for a teleconference)
> and on the weekend to come up with a plan and start the work
> for the council to discuss/accept at the Wednesday open
> meeting and at the Thursday meeting.
>
> Unless there is strong objection from the members of the
> council, I ask each SG to name 2-3 members and the active
> ACSO liaison groups to name 1 representative each for the
> STI-DT and ask Glen (or some member of staff who is not
> traveling at the moment) to set up a mailing list, with open
> archive, for that team immediately. I think it is a good
> suggestion for those SGs that have members who were on the
> IRT as either members or observers to consider including them
> among the 2-3 volunteers. I think the SGs should find people
> in the SG, not necessarily council members to populate these
> meeting - and recommend that the people doing this find
> alternatives to replace (at least temporarily) them in other
> other ongoing ICANN tasks (except of course for council membership).
>
> We do have some unused meting room space on Saturday (11am
> on), so I suggest we schedule this group consider an open
> meeting during this opne time.
>
> The topic has already been scheduled for the Wednesday open
> meeting
> (https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?agenda_28_oct_2009
> ), and has already been spoken of as the main topic for the
> Thursday meeting (https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?
> agenda_29_oct_2009).
>
> a.
>
>
>