Do we really need to go so deep into this that we are now wondering whether councillors can be trusted by their SGs and so on? On a personal level, I prefer to have an open vote. If people run for election, and then hold a grudge against those who do not vote for them, then they should not run period. Also, I prefer a totally transparent vote. But that's just me. At least one us feels very strongly about not having it open and has requested that we do not. That view should be heard and respected. As a result, it has been suggested that we vote on whether the elections should be an open ballot or a closed one. So let's just do that and move on. Stéphane Le 17/10/09 13:33, « Rosette, Kristina » <krosette@xxxxxxx> a écrit : > > My SG should trust me enough and have enough respect for my integrity such > that my word alone is sufficient. If they don't, it calls into question > whether I should be one of its representatives as well as whether I want to be > its representative if there is so little trust and respect. If that's the > case, I sure hope they'll speak up before I give up any more of my time to > this role. > > > Kristina Rosette > Covington & Burling LLP > 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. > Washington, DC 20004-2401 > voice: 202-662-5173 > direct fax: 202-778-5173 > main fax: 202-662-6291 > e-mail: krosette@xxxxxxx > > This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is > confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, > please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has > been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. > Thank you for your cooperation. > > > > > > ------------------------- > Sent from my Wireless Handheld > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>; GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sat Oct 17 03:40:25 2009 > Subject: RE: [council] Council wide Nominations are closed - Part 2 Each House > determines a Candidate > > > But how do you prove to your SG that is actually what you voted (and that you > represented them appropriately?). > > Adrian Kinderis > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Tim Ruiz > Sent: Saturday, 17 October 2009 4:16 AM > To: GNSO Council > Subject: RE: [council] Council wide Nominations are closed - Part 2 Each House > determines a Candidate > > > Chuck raises an important point. Do the CSG Councilors intend that their > votes be secret even within their SG? A secret ballot at the Council > level is a different issue from keeping Councilors' votes secret from > their constituents. > > Tim > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RE: [council] Council wide Nominations are closed - Part 2 > Each House determines a Candidate > From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, October 16, 2009 10:08 am > To: "Mary Wong" <MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Strictly from a personal point of view: > > + I favor an open ballot for accountability and transparency reasons, > but I also respect the concerns of individual Councilors. > > + If just one Councilor requests a secret ballot, I then am fine with a > secret ballot with at least one caveat that the votes of each SG's reps > be communicated to the SG. > > + If am fine with Avri's suggestion to poll the Council regarding > whether to hold a secret or open ballot. > > > I have raised this issue on the RySG list and am waiting their > direction. In the end I will respond to the poll in accordance with > that direction and not my personal views. > > Chuck > > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Mary Wong > Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 12:18 AM > Cc: Council GNSO > Subject: Re: [council] Council wide Nominations are closed - Part 2 Each > House determines a Candidate > > > > Hi > > On Oct 15, 2009, at 3:56 PM, Avri Doria wrote: >> Do other council members believe this needs to be a secret ballot? > > I think that at a time when there seems to be a lot of mistrust amongst > the ICANN community and. more importantly, when there are many new > entrants/participants and Councillors, it's important to have complete > transparency in the GNSO processes. As such, I don't support the idea of > a secret ballot in this case. > > Cheers > Mary > > > Mary W S Wong > Professor of Law & Chair, IP Programs > Franklin Pierce Law Center > Two White Street > Concord, NH 03301 > USA > Email: mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Phone: 1-603-513-5143 > Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php > Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network > (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584 > > > >
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature