RE: [council] Friendly amendment to Vertical Integration Motion

To: "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [council] Friendly amendment to Vertical Integration Motion
From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:29:48 +0200
In-reply-to: <C2F58BAB-5D01-44F9-84EC-B2793288AA53@xxxxxxx>
List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <780A738C62DA734987AC5BD2A90961D197F4C8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ABA98F60200005B00043D61@BRENNAN> <C2F58BAB-5D01-44F9-84EC-B2793288AA53@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Aco8yoESD7vwxnpDSP2HFX+2RS8tDgAHi05A


Avri, Mary,
I second the motion as amended in ever such a friendly way.
Philip

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [council] Friendly amendment to Vertical Integration Motion
  - From: William Drake

References:
- [council] Friendly amendment to Vertical Integration Motion
  - From: Rosette, Kristina
- Re: [council] Friendly amendment to Vertical Integration Motion
  - From: Mary Wong
- Re: [council] Friendly amendment to Vertical Integration Motion
  - From: Avri Doria