<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] NCAs in the new GNSO Council structure



Several have expressed views on this.  It would be helpful if we could have more list discussion about the various options and any others anyone proposes in the next week.  Our plan is to make a decision on this along with the plan for seating Councilors in Seoul on 24 September.  Please get input from the groups you represent.
 
Thanks, Chuck


From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 2:48 PM
To: GNSO Council
Subject: [council] NCAs in the new GNSO Council structure

Hi,
as discussed yesterday in the conference call, and to start the discussion in our list, I am including possible options for assigning the role of the three NCAs in the new structure of the GNSO Council:

Option a:  The NCAs talk it through and figure out which roles seem right to them.

Option b:  Random selection.

Option c:  The council members decide with random selection of which House chooses first.

Option d:  The two Houses collaborate and decide among them where the NCAs will be assigned.

Option e:  The new, inexperienced NCA rep assumes the non-voting Council seat and one of the above options is used to assign the two House seats.

Option f:   The experienced NCA rep assumes the non-voting Coundil seat and one of the above options is used to assign the two House seats

Option g: (Combination of option a and d) The two Houses collaborate and decide among them where the NCAs will be assigned, with a refusal option by any of the NCAs.


Please iclude other options thay you may think of and share your comments about this in the list.

We should decide about this in our next GNSO conference call on 24 September.

Best regards
Olga