Re: [council] NCAs in the new GNSO Council structure
If I understood Avri correctly yesterday, the immediate concern is to
address where this coming year's NCA's sit, as it is possible (but not a
sure thing) that next year the NomCom itself will take on the role. So
any decision made now could be with the understanding that it is for this
year only, with the three known NCAs.
Or it could be a generalized solution that will work every year if the
NomCom does not do it.
One last thought is that if option e is adopted, I do not think that it
would be fair to say that Andrey Kolesnikov is destined to fill that role
for his entire two years. He applied for the position based on the old
structure and rules.
Alan
At 04/09/2009 02:47 PM, Olga Cavalli wrote:
Hi,
as discussed yesterday in the conference call, and to start the
discussion in our list, I am including possible options for assigning the
role of the three NCAs in the new structure of the GNSO Council:
Option a: The NCAs talk it through and figure out which roles seem
right to them.
Option b: Random selection.
Option c: The council members decide with random selection of which
House chooses first.
Option d: The two Houses collaborate and decide among them where
the NCAs will be assigned.
Option e: The new,
inexperienced NCA rep assumes the non-voting Council seat and one of the
above options is used to assign the two House seats.
Option f: The experienced NCA rep assumes the non-voting
Coundil seat and one of the above options is used to assign the two House
seats
Option g: (Combination of option a and d) The two Houses collaborate and
decide among them where the NCAs will be assigned, with a refusal option
by any of the NCAs.
Please iclude other options thay you may think of and share your comments
about this in the list.
We should decide about this in our next GNSO conference call on 24
September.
Best regards
Olga