<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] FW: Proposed Amendments to the Fast Flux Motion




Hi,

Wouldn't this be something that would need to worked out with the RAP WG in a WG charter amendment? I tend to see changing the charter as a negotiation process between the council and the WG.

thanks

a.

On 3 Sep 2009, at 20:04, Mike Rodenbaugh wrote:

I agree with the RyC edits as friendly amendments, with one exception
regarding the mandate to the RAP-WG. Since indemnification is an agreement, and the WG is examining in detail the various agreements in the registration
chain, I would clarify and simplify this as follows:

The Registration Abuse Policy Working Group (RAPWG) should examine whether
existing policy and/or agreements empower Registries and Registrars to
mitigate illicit uses of Fast Flux;