I agree with Tim that there are already a lot of opportunities to discuss new gTLDs elsewhere, and that we may want to focus on other topics here. Stéphane Le 03/09/09 17:49, « Tim Ruiz » <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > Thanks Avri. I know that new gTLD issues weigh heavy on everyones' > minds and these issues will no doubt continue to be the focus of > much of what goes on in Seoul. But accountability is also a long > term issue that a significant portion of the community clearly > feels has not been resolved. We need to begin getting organized > across the ACSO structure to address it. > > Tim > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [council] Regarding topics for open discussion amongst SOs > and ACs > From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, September 03, 2009 10:03 am > To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Several variants of the topic have been suggested. I have not brought > the accountability topic back to the ACSO chairs yet. Will bring info > back after out meeting later tonight (UTC). > > >> Will the introduction of new gTLDs provide potential benefits to >> consumers that will outweigh any potential harm? >> >> Which could also be phrased as a more general question: >> >> What are the remaining impediments to finalising the new gTLD >> application process and what can be done to resolve them? >> >> Or a little more broadly still >> >> What are the remaining impediments to finalising the new gTLD and >> IDN Fast Track processes and what can be done to resolve these issues? >> > > a. > >
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature