<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Proposed GNSO Council Agenda 13 August 2009



Title: Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council Agenda 13 August 2009
I'll leave that one alone Rob.  :)
 
I took that in gest.
 
Chuck


From: Robert Hoggarth [mailto:robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 11:03 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Philip Sheppard; Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council Agenda 13 August 2009

Just for clarification Chuck,  the hanging or the round of drinks?

RobH


On 8/10/09 10:28 AM, "Chuck Gomes" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Philip's answers sound reasonable to me.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 10:18 AM
> To: 'Council GNSO'
> Subject: RE: [council] Proposed GNSO Council Agenda 13 August 2009
>
>
>
> Lets keep it simple.
>
> Q: How long before  the meeting should they be required to do so?
> A: Target 7 days, latest 24 hours.
>
> Q: And does the same rule apply to Council members making
> report as liaisons and Staff members making reports?
> A: Yes
>
> Q: Also what do we do if someone does not submit a report -
> allow them to give it orally or just skip the report?
> A: If staff, a hanging. If volunteers, a round of drinks for
> the entire Council.
>
> Ok ...a sensible answer ....
> A: Skip the report if not essential that day and allow it to
> be submitted in the next 7 days.
>
> Philip
>
>