<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Draft comment to the Draft IDN ccTLD Fast Track Implementation Plan Rev2



Thanks Edmon for preparing this.  I made some suggested edits that are
highlighted in the attached file that I believe do not change the
substantive meaning of what you prepared; please confirm that that is
true or, if not, suggest additional edits.

With the edits, I support this as a GNSO statement.  As Edmon states in
the document, it is consistent with previous GNSO statements approved by
the Council.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Edmon Chung
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 3:25 PM
> To: 'Council GNSO'
> Subject: [council] Draft comment to the Draft IDN ccTLD Fast 
> Track Implementation Plan Rev2
> 
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> Apologies for the delay of circulating this.  Please see 
> attached the draft comment as discussed during our wrap up 
> meeting in Mexico.
> 
> The comment basically applauds ICANN staff of the progress on 
> the process and highlights a few points:
> 1. the consideration of variants for IDN TLDs 2. the 
> identification of need for a formalized relationship between 
> ICANN and the IDN ccTLD manager 3. the recognition that 
> financial contribution should be required from IDN ccTLD 
> managers to offset its program costs
> 
> And then reiterates our resolution in January 2009 pertaining 
> the subject.
> 
> As a reminder, the comment period closes April 6 2009, 
> therefore we still have a bit more than a week to consider 
> the comments before submitting.
> 
> Edmon
> 
> 
> 

Attachment: FastTrackImplementationPlan2 (2) - GNSO Comments with Gomes edits 26 Mar 09.doc
Description: FastTrackImplementationPlan2 (2) - GNSO Comments with Gomes edits 26 Mar 09.doc