RE: [council] Re: Board Resolution on individual users
Unless someone else wants to do it, I will draft such a motion and
submit & post it NLT tomorrow.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:14 AM
> To: GNSO Council
> Subject: RE: [council] Re: Board Resolution on individual users
>
>
> (note, i have removed the cc list)
>
> On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 10:19 -0500, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> > As Denise pointed out, the Working Group on GNSO Council
> Restructuring
> > (WG-GCR), which consisted of representatives of each
> constituency and
> > the ALAC as well as a NomCom appointee, recommended to the
> Board that
> > the composition of the non-contracted party voting house of
> the GNSO
> > Council should "...be open to membership of all interested
> parties ...
> > that use or provide services for the Internet, ... and should
> > explicitly not be restricted to domain registrants as
> recommended by
> > the BGC."
> > So
> > it might be useful as a first step to simply confirm that we still
> > support this recommendation. I wouldn't think that this
> step should
> > require any special working group or drafting team. Do any
> > constituencies or NomCom appointees disagree with this
> recommendation?
>
> I think this is a reasonable step, though I would recommend
> that we take a vote on it that can show what level of support
> there is in the council, after council members have consulted
> their constituencies as appropriate.
>
> I would like to see a motion on this for next week's meeting.
>
> thanks
>
> a.
>
>