<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Corrected: US DOC/NTIA comments on new gTLD process


Hi,
I am not sure that there are any consensus statements, or even supermajority, we will be able make with regard to the Implementation plan. If there are, I assume the general SOI statements that people have on file should be sufficient. If not, they should probably be updated.
The GNSO council might also find that it is comfortable with just leaving the response at the individual or constituency level and not produce a council wide response. I just think we need to be intentional about deciding what we, as a council, wish to do. 

a.

On 22 Dec 2008, at 17:46, Gomes, Chuck wrote:


Does it really matter? I think our goal would be to try to reach rough
consensus on a possible GNSO statement. By now, I think those of us who 
have been involved for awhile, pretty much know the interests of one
another.

I submitted quite a few comments and was also involved in comments
submitted by the RyC.

Chuck


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 5:26 PM
To: Avri Doria; Council GNSO
Subject: RE: [council] Corrected: US DOC/NTIA comments on new
gTLD process


What's our plan w/r/t Council members who wrote or submitted
comments or whose employers submitted comments?  Recusal from
discussion of those specific comments?  Disclosure alone is
sufficient?

K

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 12:52 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] Corrected: US DOC/NTIA comments on new
gTLD process


Hi,

Thanks for forwardng this pointer.

After reading this and some of the other comments, and given
that we have not done much on an organized response yet, it
occurs to me that we should schedule a special meeting just
to discuss comments and response to the new gTLD implementation plan.

Unless there is strong objection, I will ask Glen to try and
find a time for early next year.

In the meantime, anyone who is interested in working on a
drafting effort to initiate something over the holiday period
is invited to volunteer.

I will volunteer.

Thanks,

a.




On 20 Dec 2008, at 06:00, Alan Greenberg wrote:



Sorry - forgot the link -
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gtld-guide/msg00175.html
.
----------------

If you haven't seen them, the DOC/NTIA and Department of Justice
Antitrust Division comments make interesting reading.

Alan