[council] ICANN Board resolution from meeting of 11 Dec 08

To: "'Gomes, Chuck'" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] ICANN Board resolution from meeting of 11 Dec 08
From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:42:59 +0100
Cc: "'Bruce Tonkin'" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF070282A3FA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <B7ACC01E42881F4981F66BA96FC14957029997CC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF070282A3ED@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CDF880C417724D4C914AA9CFC64880FE@PSEVO> <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF070282A3FA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AclhyQ/jNNIvWfvLQYqGNo7Mc+ntoAAE6hFgAAEHFiAAAS3J4AAAgLdQ

Chuck, you approach this from the perspective of an academic ... thoroughness.

I and others and I hope the Board from the perspective of priority.

Today commercial users are well represented in the GNSO.
Non-commercial are not so well represented.
That is the priority.

Today, commercial individuals have a place to go.
Other individuals do not.
That is the priority.


Philip

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [council] ICANN Board resolution from meeting of 11 Dec 08
  - From: Avri Doria

References:
- [council] ICANN Board resolution from meeting of 11 Dec 08
  - From: Bruce Tonkin
- RE: [council] ICANN Board resolution from meeting of 11 Dec 08
  - From: Gomes, Chuck
- RE: [council] ICANN Board resolution from meeting of 11 Dec 08
  - From: Philip Sheppard
- RE: [council] ICANN Board resolution from meeting of 11 Dec 08
  - From: Gomes, Chuck

Prev by Date: RE: [council] Alternative RAA Motions
Next by Date: RE: [council] ICANN Board resolution from meeting of 11 Dec 08
Previous by thread: RE: [council] ICANN Board resolution from meeting of 11 Dec 08
Next by thread: Re: [council] ICANN Board resolution from meeting of 11 Dec 08
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread