Thanks Mike. I added some comments and questions that are highlighted in the attached copy of the BC comments. As you can see for yourself, a repeated question I ask is this: "Would the BC rather delay several months to see if your suggestions could be negotiated or implement the proposed amendments as is and then work on possible changes?" Chuck > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 1:30 PM > To: 'GNSO Council' > Subject: RE: [council] Revised Report on RAA amendments > > With the attachment... > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 10:22 AM > To: 'GNSO Council' > Subject: RE: [council] Revised Report on RAA amendments > > > Chuck, > > As a start, attached are the BC's comments from August. > Perhaps Staff and/or the Registrar reps could explain how our > comments, or any other public comments, have been > incorporated into the RAA Amendments proposal since then? > Other constituencies may also feel that their comments have > been completely ignored. > > Thanks, > Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 9:18 AM > To: Avri Doria; Liz Gasster > Cc: Council GNSO > Subject: RE: [council] Revised Report on RAA amendments > > > I hope we can at least get some details about which of the > amendments people are concerned with. I am having trouble > understanding which of them would not be better than what we > have now. If I am wrong, fine. > But if I am not, I think we should quit delaying. > > Chuck > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria > > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 11:23 AM > > To: Liz Gasster > > Cc: Council GNSO > > Subject: Re: [council] Revised Report on RAA amendments > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Thanks Liz. > > > > I think that at this point it might make sense to postpone > the vote on > > the RAA from this week's meeting and to include some explanation on > > these amendments. I will try to adjust the timings on > the various > > meeting topics accordingly. > > > > a. > > > > > > > > On 15 Dec 2008, at 16:43, Liz Gasster wrote: > > > > > > > > Chuck and all, > > > > > > In addition to being an update with more detail than was > previously > > > provided, this is the written report detailed in the current RAA > > > process for amendments in subsection 4.3.1 > > > (http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/ra-agreement-17may01.htm#4.3.1 > > > ). Services staff wanted to make sure this information was > > available > > > to the GNSO before it considered a vote on the RAA amendments. > > > > > > Most notably, it also contains two new proposed amendments > > that arose > > > from the latest public comment period and subsequent community > > > dialogue. One of these enhances the licensee provision and > > the other > > > requires registrars to post their current email and mailing > > address on > > > their websites. > > > > > > Please let me know if you have any other questions. > > > > > > Thanks, Liz > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 6:50 AM > > > To: Liz Gasster; Council GNSO > > > Subject: RE: [council] Revised Report on RAA amendments > > > > > > Thanks Liz. What was updated? > > > > > > Chuck > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Gasster > > >> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 9:01 PM > > >> To: Council GNSO > > >> Subject: [council] Revised Report on RAA amendments > > >> Importance: High > > >> > > >> All, > > >> > > >> Attached please find an updated report from Services on > > the pending > > >> amendments to the RAA. This report updates and expands on > > the paper > > >> sent on 29 October 2008. > > >> > > >> Thanks, Liz > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
Attachment:
RAA_amendments-08-08 from CBUC with Gomes comments.doc
Description: RAA_amendments-08-08 from CBUC with Gomes comments.doc